Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28207921›Full record

ArticleLab on a chip2017

Pneumatic stimulation of C. elegans mechanoreceptor neurons in a microfluidic trap.

Adam L Nekimken, Holger Fehlauer, Anna A Kim, Sandra N Manosalvas-Kjono, Purim Ladpli, Farah Memon, Divya Gopisetty, Veronica Sanchez, Miriam B Goodman, Beth L Pruitt and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab on a chip, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. An expanded GCaMP reporter toolkit for functional imaging inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Microfluidic-AssistedCyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Adam L NekimkenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. mbgoodman@stanford.edu pruitt@stanford.edu and Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. michael.krieg@icfo.eu.
Holger FehlauerDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. michael.krieg@icfo.eu.
Anna A KimDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. michael.krieg@icfo.eu and Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1861-3801
Sandra N Manosalvas-KjonoDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Purim LadpliDepartment of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Farah MemonDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Divya GopisettyDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. michael.krieg@icfo.eu.
Veronica SanchezDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. mbgoodman@stanford.edu pruitt@stanford.edu.
Miriam B GoodmanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. mbgoodman@stanford.edu pruitt@stanford.edu and Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. michael.krieg@icfo.eu.ORCID 0000-0002-5810-1272
Beth L PruittDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. mbgoodman@stanford.edu pruitt@stanford.edu and Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. michael.krieg@icfo.eu and Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Michael KriegDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. michael.krieg@icfo.eu.ORCID 0000-0003-0501-5036

Funding

Molecular Basis of Sensory Transduction in C. elegansR01NS047715 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOODMAN, MIRIAM B · 2004 to 2017
$4.9M
Force Clamp Systems for Evaluation of MechanotransductionR01EB006745 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOODMAN, MIRIAM B, PRUITT, BETH L · 2007 to 2014
$3.1M
Request to purchase replace cryogenic storage equipment to preserve biological reagents.R01NS092099 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOODMAN, MIRIAM B · 2015 to 2017
$1.1M
The mechanical control of mechanosensationK99NS089942 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KRIEG, MICHAEL · 2014 to 2015
$178k
Internal Tissue Mechanics and the Sense of Touch in C. elegansF31NS100318 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NEKIMKEN, ADAM · 2017 to 2019
$106k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006745NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS100318NINDS NIH HHS K99 NS089942NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS047715NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS092099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New tools for applying force to animals, tissues, and cells are critically needed in order to advance the field of mechanobiology, as few existing tools enable simultaneous imaging of tissue and cell deformation as well as cellular activity in live animals. Here, we introduce a novel microfluidic device that enables high-resolution optical imaging of cellular deformations and activity while applying precise mechanical stimuli to the surface of the worm's cuticle with a pneumatic pressure reservoir. To evaluate device performance, we compared analytical and numerical simulations conducted during the design process to empirical measurements made with fabricated devices. Leveraging the well-characterized touch receptor neurons (TRNs) with an optogenetic calcium indicator as a model mechanoreceptor neuron, we established that individual neurons can be stimulated and that the device can effectively deliver steps as well as more complex stimulus patterns. This microfluidic device is therefore a valuable platform for investigating the mechanobiology of living animals and their mechanosensitive neurons.

Indexed as

Lab-On-A-Chip DevicesMechanoreceptorsMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCaenorhabditis elegansCalciumEquipment DesignOptical ImagingOptogeneticsPhysical StimulationCalcium

Identifiers

PMID28207921
PMCPMC5360562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.