ArticlePloS one2017
Three-dimensional acetabular orientation measurement in a reliable coordinate system among one hundred Chinese.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robotic-referenced automated measurement of acetabular cup orientation on postoperative CT: development and internal validation.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Computational modelling of acetabular morphology and its implications for cup positioning.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Methods for three-dimensional characterization of the acetabulum prior to pelvic reorientation osteotomy: a scoping review.EFORT open reviews · 2024Article
- Article
- Evaluation of lateral and anterior center-edge angles according to sex and anterior pelvic plane tilt angle: a three-dimensional quantitative analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Sex differences in the anatomy of the anterior-superior acetabular rim in relation to pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement in Koreans: a three-dimensional quantitative analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- The "true" acetabular anteversion angle (AV angle): 2D CT versus 3D model.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022Article
- Displacement Pattern of Anterior and Posterior Column Fragments in Both-Column Acetabular Fractures: A 3D Reconstruction-Based Study.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- [Radiographic inclination and anteversion do not correspond to the actual cup slope and forward rotation].Der Orthopade · 2020Article
- Personalized Cup Positioning Guides Improved Cup Positioning and Hip Ranges of Motion in Robotic Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- A robust method for automatic identification of landmarks on surface models of the pelvis.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Measurement of acetabular inclination and anteversion via CT generated 3D pelvic model.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Determining three-dimensional (3D) acetabular orientation is important for several orthopaedic scenarios, but the complex geometries of both pelvis and acetabulum make measurements of orientation unreliable. Acetabular orientation may also differ between the sexes or racial groups. We aimed to (1) establish and evaluate a novel method for measuring 3D acetabular orientation, (2) apply this new method to a large population of Chinese subjects, and (3) report relevant characteristics of native acetabular orientation in this population. We obtained computed tomography scans taken for non-orthopaedic indications in 100 Chinese subjects (50 male, 50 female). A novel algorithm tailored to segmentation of the hip joint was used to construct 3D pelvic models from these scans. We developed a surface-based method to establish a reliable 3D pelvic coordinate system and software to semi-automatically measure 3D acetabular orientation. Differences in various acetabular orientations were compared within and between subjects, between male and female subjects, and between our subjects and subjects previously reported by another group. The reported method was reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.999). Acetabular orientations were symmetrical within subjects, but ranged widely between subjects. The sexes differed significantly in acetabular anteversion (average difference, 3.0°; p < 0.001) and inclination (1.5°; p < 0.03). Acetabular anteversion and inclination were substantially smaller among our Chinese subjects than previously reported for American subjects. Thus, our method was reliable and sensitive, and we detected sex differences in 3D acetabular orientation. Awareness of differences between the sexes and races is the first step towards better reconstruction of the hip joint for all individuals and could also be applied to other orthopaedic scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.