Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28207813›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2017

Interacting networks of resistance, virulence and core machinery genes identified by genome-wide epistasis analysis.

Marcin J Skwark, Nicholas J Croucher, Santeri Puranen, Claire Chewapreecha, Maiju Pesonen, Ying Ying Xu, Paul Turner, Simon R Harris, Stephen B Beres, James M Musser and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Identification of potential pathogenic targets and survival strategies ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. An Epistatic Network DescribesFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Marcin J SkwarkDepartment of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2022-6766
Nicholas J CroucherDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6303-8768
Santeri PuranenDepartment of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6388-7110
Claire ChewapreechaDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1313-4011
Maiju PesonenDepartment of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Ying Ying XuDepartment of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9096-0552
Paul TurnerShoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Mae Sot, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-1013-7815
Simon R HarrisPathogen Genomics, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1512-6194
Stephen B BeresCenter for Molecular and Translational Human Infectious Diseases Research, Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, and Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3041-0185
James M MusserCenter for Molecular and Translational Human Infectious Diseases Research, Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, and Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Julian ParkhillPathogen Genomics, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7069-5958
Stephen D BentleyPathogen Genomics, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Erik AurellDepartment of Computational Biology, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jukka CoranderPathogen Genomics, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Aalto University · FIWellcome Sanger Institute · GBHouston Methodist · USChinese Academy of Sciences · CNImperial College London · GBMahidol University · THStatistics Finland · FIUniversity of Cambridge · GBVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust 104169/Z/14/ZWellcome Trust 107276/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in the scale and diversity of population genomic datasets for bacteria now provide the potential for genome-wide patterns of co-evolution to be studied at the resolution of individual bases. Here we describe a new statistical method, genomeDCA, which uses recent advances in computational structural biology to identify the polymorphic loci under the strongest co-evolutionary pressures. We apply genomeDCA to two large population data sets representing the major human pathogens Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) and Streptococcus pyogenes (group A Streptococcus). For pneumococcus we identified 5,199 putative epistatic interactions between 1,936 sites. Over three-quarters of the links were between sites within the pbp2x, pbp1a and pbp2b genes, the sequences of which are critical in determining non-susceptibility to beta-lactam antibiotics. A network-based analysis found these genes were also coupled to that encoding dihydrofolate reductase, changes to which underlie trimethoprim resistance. Distinct from these antibiotic resistance genes, a large network component of 384 protein coding sequences encompassed many genes critical in basic cellular functions, while another distinct component included genes associated with virulence. The group A Streptococcus (GAS) data set population represents a clonal population with relatively little genetic variation and a high level of linkage disequilibrium across the genome. Despite this, we were able to pinpoint two RNA pseudouridine synthases, which were each strongly linked to a separate set of loci across the chromosome, representing biologically plausible targets of co-selection. The population genomic analysis method applied here identifies statistically significantly co-evolving locus pairs, potentially arising from fitness selection interdependence reflecting underlying protein-protein interactions, or genes whose product activities contribute to the same phenotype. This discovery approach greatly enhances the future potential of epistasis analysis for systems biology, and can complement genome-wide association studies as a means of formulating hypotheses for targeted experimental work.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticAminoacyltransferasesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-Lactam Resistancebeta-LactamsGene Regulatory NetworksGenetics, PopulationGenome, BacterialGenomicsGenotypeHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPenicillin-Binding ProteinsPeptidyl TransferasesSelection, GeneticAminoacyltransferasesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamsPBP1a protein, Streptococcus pneumoniaePBP 2x protein, Streptococcuspenicillin-binding protein 2b, StreptococcusPenicillin-Binding ProteinsPeptidyl Transferases

Identifiers

PMID28207813
PMCPMC5312804
OpenAlexW2951188778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.