Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28207800›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Perception-production relations in later development of American English rhotics.

Tara McAllister Byun, Mark Tiede

5 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03736213 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Correcting Residual Errors With Spectral, Ultrasound, and Traditional Speech Therapy: Delineation of Sensorimotor Subtypes

TypeinterventionalSponsorNew York UniversityRan2019 to 2022Enrolled7ConditionsSpeech Sound DisorderArmsVisual-acoustic biofeedback, Ultrasound biofeedback
NCT03737318 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Correcting Residual Errors With Spectral, Ultrasound, and Traditional Speech Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNew York UniversityRan2019 to 2024Enrolled108ConditionsSpeech Sound DisorderArmsBiofeedback-ultrasound, Biofeedback--visual-acoustic, Traditional articulation treatment
NCT04625062 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Comparing Traditional and Biofeedback Treatment for Residual Speech Errors Via Telepractice

TypeinterventionalSponsorNew York UniversityRan2020 to 2021Enrolled7ConditionsSpeech Sound DisorderArmsVisual-acoustic biofeedback, Motor-based treatment
NCT04858022 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Online Assessment and Enhancement of Auditory Perception for Speech Sound Errors: Visual Acoustic Biofeedback for RSE Via Telepractice

TypeinterventionalSponsorMontclair State UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsSpeech Sound DisorderArmsVisual-Acoustic Biofeedback Treatment, No Treatment
NCT04858035 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Online Assessment and Enhancement of Auditory Perception for Speech Sound Errors: Online Perceptual Training for RSE

TypeinterventionalSponsorMontclair State UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled10ConditionsSpeech Sound DisorderArmsPerceptual training, Production training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Online Assessment and Enhancement of Auditory Perception for Residual /ɹ/ Distortions.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Auditory and Somatosensory Development for Speech in Later Childhood.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Computer-assisted challenge point intervention for residual speech errors.Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tara McAllister ByunDepartment of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Mark TiedeHaskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.

Funding

Improving clinical speech remediation with ultrasound technologyR01DC013668 · NIDCD · CUNY GRADUATE SCH AND UNIV CTR · PI BOYCE, SUZANNE ELIZABETH, WHALEN, DOUGLAS H · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
Understanding and eliminating residual speech errors with acoustic biofeedbackR03DC012883 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI MCALLISTER, TARA · 2013 to 2015
$458k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013668NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC012883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is known that some adult listeners have more sharply defined perceptual categories than others, and listeners with more precise auditory targets are also more precise in their production of contrasts. There is additionally evidence that children who have not yet mastered production of a contrast show diminished performance on perceptual measures of the same contrast. To date, however, few studies have investigated developmental perception-production relations using the fine-grained measures typical of adult studies. Existing evidence suggests that perception and production can be closely connected in development, but this relationship may break down as perception and articulation mature at different rates. This study evaluated perception and production of the English /r-w/ contrast in 40 typically-developing children aged 9-14. Perceptual sensitivity was measured with a logistic function fitted over responses in a forced-choice identification task using two synthetic 10-step continua from rake to wake. Participants also produced rhotic and non-rhotic words. Across participants, there was a significant correlation between perceptual acuity and rhoticity in production, although this effect was only observed for one of two continua tested. These results provide preliminary evidence compatible with the hypothesis that children with a more refined auditory target for a sound also produce that sound more accurately.

Indexed as

LanguagePhoneticsSpeech Articulation TestsAdolescentAuditory PerceptionChildFemaleHumansMaleSpeech PerceptionUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28207800
PMCPMC5313169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.