ArticlePLoS computational biology2017
Testing the limits of gradient sensing.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perfect adaptation in eukaryotic gradient sensing using cooperative allosteric binding.Physical review. E · 2026Article
- Ratiometric signaling produces robust temporal integration for accurate cellular gradient sensing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Emergent eukaryotic directional sensing via receptor degradation and diffusion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Kinetic Monte Carlo methods for three-dimensional diffusive capture problems in exterior domains.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Particle-based simulations reveal two positive feedback loops allow relocation and stabilization of the polarity site during yeast mating.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Single-cell directional sensing from just a few receptor binding events.Biophysical journal · 2023Article
- Short-time diffusive fluxes over membrane receptors yields the direction of a signalling source.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- Orientation of Cell Polarity by Chemical Gradients.Annual review of biophysics · 2022Review
- Chemotactic movement of a polarity site enables yeast cells to find their mates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Mating yeast cells use an intrinsic polarity site to assemble a pheromone-gradient tracking machine.The Journal of cell biology · 2019Article
- Ratiometric GPCR signaling enables directional sensing in yeast.PLoS biology · 2019Article
- Particle-based simulations of polarity establishment reveal stochastic promotion of Turing pattern formation.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Mixed analytical-stochastic simulation method for the recovery of a Brownian gradient source from probability fluxes to small windows.Journal of computational physics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to detect a chemical gradient is fundamental to many cellular processes. In multicellular organisms gradient sensing plays an important role in many physiological processes such as wound healing and development. Unicellular organisms use gradient sensing to move (chemotaxis) or grow (chemotropism) towards a favorable environment. Some cells are capable of detecting extremely shallow gradients, even in the presence of significant molecular-level noise. For example, yeast have been reported to detect pheromone gradients as shallow as 0.1 nM/μm. Noise reduction mechanisms, such as time-averaging and the internalization of pheromone molecules, have been proposed to explain how yeast cells filter fluctuations and detect shallow gradients. Here, we use a Particle-Based Reaction-Diffusion model of ligand-receptor dynamics to test the effectiveness of these mechanisms and to determine the limits of gradient sensing. In particular, we develop novel simulation methods for establishing chemical gradients that not only allow us to study gradient sensing under steady-state conditions, but also take into account transient effects as the gradient forms. Based on reported measurements of reaction rates, our results indicate neither time-averaging nor receptor endocytosis significantly improves the cell's accuracy in detecting gradients over time scales associated with the initiation of polarized growth. Additionally, our results demonstrate the physical barrier of the cell membrane sharpens chemical gradients across the cell. While our studies are motivated by the mating response of yeast, we believe our results and simulation methods will find applications in many different contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.