Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28207547›Full record

ArticleMedicine2017

Planning for operating room efficiency and faster anesthesia wake-up time in open major upper abdominal surgery.

Hou-Chuan Lai, Shun-Ming Chan, Chueng-He Lu, Chih-Shung Wong, Chen-Hwan Cherng, Zhi-Fu Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Retrospective Analysis of Respiratory Complications under General Anesthesia during EBUS-TBNA.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hou-Chuan LaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center Division of Anesthesiology, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Shun-Ming Chan
Chueng-He Lu
Chih-Shung Wong
Chen-Hwan Cherng
Zhi-Fu Wu
Tri-Service General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reducing anesthesia-controlled time (ACT) may improve operation room (OR) efficiency result from different anesthetic techniques. However, the information about the difference in ACT between desflurane (DES) anesthesia and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) techniques for open major upper abdominal surgery under general anesthesia (GA) is not available in the literature.This retrospective study uses our hospital database to analyze the ACT of open major upper abdominal surgery without liver resection after either desflurane/fentanyl-based anesthesia or TIVA via target-controlled infusion with fentanyl/propofol from January 2010 to December 2011. The various time intervals including waiting for anesthesia time, anesthesia time, surgical time, extubation time, exit from OR after extubation, total OR time, and postanesthetic care unit (PACU) stay time and percentage of prolonged extubation (≥15 minutes) were compared between these 2 anesthetic techniques.We included data from 343 patients, with 159 patients receiving TIVA and 184 patients receiving DES. The only significant difference is extubation time, TIVA was faster than the DES group (8.5 ± 3.8 vs 9.4 ± 3.7 minutes; P = 0.04). The factors contributed to prolonged extubation were age, gender, body mass index, DES anesthesia, and anesthesia time.In our hospital, propofol-based TIVA by target-controlled infusion provides faster emergence compared with DES anesthesia; however, it did not improve OR efficiency in open major abdominal surgery. Older, male gender, higher body mass index, DES anesthesia, and lengthy anesthesia time were factors that contribute to extubation time.

Indexed as

Efficiency, OrganizationalAdjuvants, AnesthesiaAgedAirway ExtubationAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthesia Recovery PeriodAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousDesfluraneDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleFentanylHerniorrhaphyHumansIsofluraneMaleAdjuvants, AnesthesiaAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousDesfluraneFentanylIsofluranePropofol

Identifiers

PMID28207547
PMCPMC5319536
OpenAlexW2588317238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.