Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28207402›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on nanobioscience2017

Reconstructing the Temporal Progression of Biological Data Using Cluster Spanning Trees.

Ryan Eshleman, Rahul Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on nanobioscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ryan Eshleman
Rahul Singh

Funding

An automated high throughput phenotypic screen for schistosomiasis drug discoveryR01AI089896 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ARKIN, MICHELLE, CAFFREY, CONOR · 2010 to 2012
$1.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI089896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying the temporal progression of a set of biological samples is crucial for comprehending the dynamics of the underlying molecular interactions. It is often also a basic step in data denoising and synchronization. Finally, identifying the progression order is crucial for problems like cell lineage identification, disease progression, tumor classification, and epidemiology and thus impacts the spectrum of disciplines spanning basic biology, drug discovery, and public health. Current methods that attempt solving this problem, face difficulty when it is necessary to factor-in complex relationships within the data, such as grouping, partial ordering or bifurcating or multifurcating progressions. We propose the notion of cluster spanning trees (CST) that can model both linear as well as the aforementioned complex progression relationships in temporally evolving data. Through a number of experimental investigations involving synthetic data sets as well as data sets from the cell cycle, cellular differentiation, phenotypic screening, and genetic variation, we show that the proposed CST approach outperforms existing methods in reconstructing the temporal progression of the data.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisModels, BiologicalAlgorithmsAnimalsCell CycleComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualHumansPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSchistosoma mansoniTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID28207402
PMCPMC5498219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.