Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28207294›Full record

ArticleJournal of athletic training2017

Validity of Core Temperature Measurements at 3 Rectal Depths During Rest, Exercise, Cold-Water Immersion, and Recovery.

Kevin C Miller, Lexie E Hughes, Blaine C Long, William M Adams, Douglas J Casa

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of athletic training, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin C MillerCentral Michigan University, Mount Pleasant.
Lexie E HughesCentral Michigan University, Mount Pleasant.
Blaine C LongCentral Michigan University, Mount Pleasant.
William M AdamsUniversity of Connecticut, Storrs.
Douglas J CasaUniversity of Connecticut, Storrs.
Central Michigan University · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextNo evidence-based recommendation exists regarding how far clinicians should insert a rectal thermistor to obtain the most valid estimate of core temperature. Knowing the validity of temperatures at different rectal depths has implications for exertional heat-stroke (EHS) management.

objectiveTo determine whether rectal temperature (T

designCross-sectional study.

settingLaboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER

participantsSeventeen individuals (14 men, 3 women: age = 23 ± 2 years, mass = 79.7 ± 12.4 kg, height = 177.8 ± 9.8 cm, body fat = 9.4% ± 4.1%, body surface area = 1.97 ± 0.19 m INTERVENTION(S): Rectal temperatures taken at 4 cm, 10 cm, and 15 cm from the anal sphincter were compared with T MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The T

resultsRectal depth affected bias (F

conclusionsWhen EHS is suspected, clinicians should insert the flexible rectal thermistor to 15 cm (6 in) because it is the most valid depth. The low level of bias during exercise suggests T

Indexed as

Body TemperatureCold TemperatureCross-Sectional StudiesExerciseFemaleFeverHeat StrokeHot TemperatureHumansImmersionMaleRectumRestWaterYoung AdultWateresophagusexertional heat strokehyperthermia

Identifiers

PMID28207294
PMCPMC5402531
OpenAlexW2588445210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.