Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28206996›Full record

Observational studyJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2017

The quest for sustained multiple morbidity reduction in very low-birth-weight infants: the Antifragility project.

J W Kaempf, N M Schmidt, S Rogers, C Novack, M Friant, L Wang, N Tipping

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Paving New Roads Towards Biodiversity-Based Drug Development in Brazil: Lessons from the Past and Future Perspectives.Revista brasileira de farmacognosia : orgao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J W KaempfWomen and Children's Program, Department of Neonatology, Providence St. Vincent Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA.
N M SchmidtWomen and Children's Program, Department of Neonatology, Providence St. Vincent Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA.
S RogersWomen and Children's Program, Department of Neonatology, Providence St. Vincent Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA.
C NovackWomen and Children's Program, Department of Neonatology, Providence St. Vincent Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA.
M FriantWomen and Children's Program, Department of Neonatology, Providence St. Vincent Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA.
L WangWomen and Children's Program, Department of Neonatology, Providence St. Vincent Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA.
N TippingWomen and Children's Program, Department of Neonatology, Providence St. Vincent Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA.
Providence St. Vincent Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCan a comprehensive, explicitly directive evidence-based guideline for all therapies that might affect the major morbidities of very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants help a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) further improve generally favorable morbidity rates? Can Antifragility principles of provider adaptive growth from stressors, enhanced infant risk assessment and adherence to effective therapies minimize unproven treatments and reduce all morbidities? STUDY

designProspectively planned observational trial in VLBW infants: control group born October 2011 to September 2013 and study group October 2013 to September 2015. Multi-disciplinary evidence-based review assigned all NICU treatments into one of four distinct categories: (1) always employ this therapy for VLBW infants, (2) never use this therapy, (3) employ this questionable therapy thoughtfully, only in certain circumstances and (4) this therapy has insufficient evidence of efficacy and safety. Extensive staff education emphasized evidence-based potentially better practice (PBP) selection with compliance checks, appreciation of intertwined co-morbidities and prioritizing infant risk reduction strategies.

resultsControl included 221 infants, mean (s.d.) age 29 (2.6) weeks, birth weight 1129 (257) g and Study included 197 infants, 29 (2.7) weeks, 1093 (292) g. One hundred and four distinct therapies were placed into categories 1 to 4, with 32 specific compliance checks. Overall mean compliance with the process checks during the second era was 70%, high: 100% (exclusive breast milk use), low: 24% (correct pulse oximetry alarm settings). Morbidity and mortality rates did not significantly change during the second era.

conclusionsIn our NICU with favorable morbidity rates, an expanded effort using a comprehensive therapy guideline for VLBW infants did not further improve outcomes. We need deeper understanding of continuous quality improvement (CQI) fundamentals, therapy compliance, co-morbidity relationships and enhanced sensitivity of risk assessment. Our innovative Antifragility PBP guideline could be useful to other NICUs seeking improvement in VLBW infant morbidities, as we offer a reasoned and concise template of a broad array of therapies categorized efficiently for transparency and review, designed to enhance responsible CQI decision-making.

Indexed as

Infant, Very Low Birth WeightBirth WeightFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleMorbidityMultiple Chronic ConditionsOregonPractice Guidelines as TopicProspective StudiesQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID28206996
PMCPMC5451666
OpenAlexW2587996450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.