Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28206829›Full record

ReviewMultiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)2017

Validity of low-contrast letter acuity as a visual performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis.

Laura J Balcer, Jenelle Raynowska, Rachel Nolan, Steven L Galetta, Raju Kapoor, Ralph Benedict, Glenn Phillips, Nicholas LaRocca, Lynn Hudson, Richard Rudick and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Combined cognitive rehabilitation and neurofeedback therapy: effects on executive function and cognitive flexibility in people with multiple sclerosis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. OCT-Based Retina Assessment Reflects Visual Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Retinal Function in Advanced Multiple Sclerosis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laura J BalcerDepartment of Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Jenelle RaynowskaDepartment of Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Rachel NolanDepartment of Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Steven L GalettaDepartment of Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Raju KapoorNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
Ralph BenedictDepartment of Neurology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Glenn PhillipsBiogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Nicholas LaRoccaNational Multiple Sclerosis Society, New York, NY, USA.
Lynn HudsonCritical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Richard RudickBiogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Multiple Sclerosis Outcome Assessments ConsortiumMultiple Sclerosis Outcome Assessments Consortium (MSOAC), Critical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-contrast letter acuity (LCLA) has emerged as the leading outcome measure to assess visual disability in multiple sclerosis (MS) research. As visual dysfunction is one of the most common manifestations of MS, sensitive visual outcome measures are important in examining the effect of treatment. Low-contrast acuity captures visual loss not seen in high-contrast visual acuity (HCVA) measurements. These issues are addressed by the MS Outcome Assessments Consortium (MSOAC), including representatives from advocacy organizations, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), academic institutions, and industry partners along with persons living with MS. MSOAC goals are acceptance and qualification by regulators of performance outcomes that are highly reliable and valid, practical, cost-effective, and meaningful to persons with MS. A critical step is elucidation of clinically relevant benchmarks, well-defined degrees of disability, and gradients of change that are clinically meaningful. This review shows that MS and disease-free controls have similar median HCVA, while MS patients have significantly lower LCLA. Deficits in LCLA and vision-specific quality of life are found many years after an episode of acute optic neuritis, even when HCVA has recovered. Studies reveal correlations between LCLA and the Expanded Disability Status Score (EDSS), Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell layer plus inner plexiform layer (GCL + IPL) thickness on optical coherence tomography (OCT), brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), visual evoked potential (VEP), electroretinogram (ERG), pupillary function, and King-Devick testing. This review also concludes that a 7-point change in LCLA is clinically meaningful. The overall goal of this review is to describe and characterize the LCLA metric for research and clinical use among persons with MS.

Indexed as

Neurologic ExaminationOutcome Assessment, Health CareEvoked Potentials, VisualHumansMultiple SclerosisQuality of LifeVisual Acuityfunctionlow-contrast letter acuityMultiple sclerosisoptical coherence tomographyquality of lifevision

Identifiers

PMID28206829
PMCPMC5407511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.