Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28205633›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Does Zika virus infection affect mosquito response to repellents?

Walter S Leal, Rosângela M R Barbosa, Fangfang Zeng, Gabriel B Faierstein, Kaiming Tan, Marcelo H S Paiva, Duschinka R D Guedes, Mônica M Crespo, Constância F J Ayres

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Walter S LealDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Rosângela M R BarbosaDepartment of Entomology, Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Campus da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, 50.740-465, Brasil.
Fangfang ZengDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Gabriel B FaiersteinDepartment of Entomology, Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Campus da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, 50.740-465, Brasil.
Kaiming TanDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Marcelo H S PaivaDepartment of Entomology, Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Campus da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, 50.740-465, Brasil.
Duschinka R D GuedesDepartment of Entomology, Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Campus da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, 50.740-465, Brasil.
Mônica M CrespoDepartment of Entomology, Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Campus da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, 50.740-465, Brasil.
Constância F J AyresDepartment of Entomology, Centro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Campus da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, 50.740-465, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Olfactory protein-based screening of oviposition attractants for Culex mosquitoesR01AI095514 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LEAL, WALTER S · 2012 to 2021
$3.6M
Is Culex quinquefasciatus a vector of the Zika virus?R21AI128931 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LEAL, WALTER S · 2016 to 2017
$392k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI095514NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI128931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that people travelling to or living in areas with Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreaks or epidemics adopt prophylactic measures to reduce or eliminate mosquito bites, including the use of insect repellents. It is, however, unknown whether repellents are effective against ZIKV-infected mosquitoes, in part because of the ethical concerns related to exposing a human subject's arm to infected mosquitoes in the standard arm-in-cage assay. We used a previously developed, human subject-free behavioural assay, which mimics a human subject to evaluate the top two recommended insect repellents. Our measurements showed that DEET provided significantly higher protection than picaridin provided against noninfected, host-seeking females of the southern house mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus, and the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. When tested at lower doses, we observed a significant reduction in DEET-elicited protection against ZIKV-infected yellow fever mosquitoes from old and recent laboratory colonies. The reduction in protection is more likely associated with aging than the virus infection and could be compensated by applying a 5x higher dose of DEET. A substantial protection against ZIKV-infected and old noninfected mosquitoes was achieved with 5% DEET, which corresponds approximately to a 30% dose in the conventional arm-in-cage assays.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsCulexCulicidaeDEETDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansInsect RepellentsModels, TheoreticalMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsPiperidinesZika Virus InfectionDEETInsect RepellentspicaridinPiperidines

Identifiers

PMID28205633
PMCPMC5311973
OpenAlexW2588275155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.