Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28205599›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Network growth models: A behavioural basis for attachment proportional to fitness.

Michael Bell, Supun Perera, Mahendrarajah Piraveenan, Michiel Bliemer, Tanya Latty, Chris Reid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Brain connectome from neuronal morphology.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Game Theory in Defence Applications: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Prediction and prevention of disproportionally dominant agents in complex networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Network effects govern the evolution of maritime trade.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael BellUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2008, Australia.
Supun PereraUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2008, Australia.
Mahendrarajah PiraveenanUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2008, Australia.
Michiel BliemerUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2008, Australia.
Tanya LattyUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2008, Australia.
Chris ReidUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2008, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several growth models have been proposed in the literature for scale-free complex networks, with a range of fitness-based attachment models gaining prominence recently. However, the processes by which such fitness-based attachment behaviour can arise are less well understood, making it difficult to compare the relative merits of such models. This paper analyses an evolutionary mechanism that would give rise to a fitness-based attachment process. In particular, it is proven by analytical and numerical methods that in homogeneous networks, the minimisation of maximum exposure to node unfitness leads to attachment probabilities that are proportional to node fitness. This result is then extended to heterogeneous networks, with supply chain networks being used as an example.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID28205599
PMCPMC5304319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.