Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28205546›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

CRISPR/Cpf1-mediated DNA-free plant genome editing.

Hyeran Kim, Sang-Tae Kim, Jahee Ryu, Beum-Chang Kang, Jin-Soo Kim, Sang-Gyu Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 238 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
238citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
22.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

238 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 508 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Molecular mechanisms and biotechnology applications of CRISPR-Cas12a.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  10. Advances in mutant characterization for detecting causal mutations in crop plants.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

178 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hyeran KimCenter for Genome Engineering, Institute for Basic Science, 70, Yuseong-daero 1689-gil, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34047, South Korea.
Sang-Tae KimCenter for Genome Engineering, Institute for Basic Science, 70, Yuseong-daero 1689-gil, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34047, South Korea.
Jahee RyuCenter for Genome Engineering, Institute for Basic Science, 70, Yuseong-daero 1689-gil, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34047, South Korea.
Beum-Chang KangCenter for Genome Engineering, Institute for Basic Science, 70, Yuseong-daero 1689-gil, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34047, South Korea.
Jin-Soo KimCenter for Genome Engineering, Institute for Basic Science, 70, Yuseong-daero 1689-gil, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34047, South Korea.
Sang-Gyu KimCenter for Genome Engineering, Institute for Basic Science, 70, Yuseong-daero 1689-gil, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34047, South Korea.
Institute for Basic Science · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cpf1, a type V CRISPR effector, recognizes a thymidine-rich protospacer-adjacent motif and induces cohesive double-stranded breaks at the target site guided by a single CRISPR RNA (crRNA). Here we show that Cpf1 can be used as a tool for DNA-free editing of plant genomes. We describe the delivery of recombinant Cpf1 proteins with in vitro transcribed or chemically synthesized target-specific crRNAs into protoplasts isolated from soybean and wild tobacco. Designed crRNAs are unique and do not have similar sequences (≤3 mismatches) in the entire soybean reference genome. Targeted deep sequencing analyses show that mutations are successfully induced in FAD2 paralogues in soybean and AOC in wild tobacco. Unlike SpCas9, Cpf1 mainly induces various nucleotide deletions at target sites. No significant mutations are detected at potential off-target sites in the soybean genome. These results demonstrate that Cpf1-crRNA complex is an effective DNA-free genome-editing tool for plant genome editing.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantBacterial ProteinsClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Associated ProteinsDNA, PlantEndodeoxyribonucleasesEndonucleasesFatty Acid DesaturasesGene DeletionGene EditingGlycine maxMutationNicotianaProtoplastsRecombinant ProteinsRNABacterial ProteinsCas12a proteinCRISPR-Associated ProteinsDNA, PlantEndodeoxyribonucleasesEndonucleasesFAD2 protein, ArabidopsisFatty Acid DesaturasesRecombinant ProteinsRNA

Identifiers

PMID28205546
PMCPMC5316869
OpenAlexW2588577496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.