Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28205497›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS2017

Critical Motor Involvement in Prediction of Human and Non-biological Motion Trajectories.

Matthieu M de Wit, Laurel J Buxbaum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The neural networks of touch observation.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Gesture profiles distinguish primary progressive aphasia variants.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Measuring the prediction of observed actions using an occlusion paradigm: Comparing autistic and non-autistic adults.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2022
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Limb apraxia and the left parietal lobe.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthieu M de WitMoss Rehabilitation Research Institute,Elkins Park,Pennsylvania.
Laurel J BuxbaumMoss Rehabilitation Research Institute,Elkins Park,Pennsylvania.
Moss Rehabilitation Hospital · US

Funding

Postdoctoral Training in Translational Neurorehabilitation ResearchT32HD071844 · NICHD · ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK · PI WHYTE, JOHN · 2013 to 2022
$2.2M
Understanding Action Selection in the Tool Use NetworkR01NS099061 · NINDS · ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK · PI BUXBAUM, LAUREL J · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD071844NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS099061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAdaptive interaction with the environment requires the ability to predict both human and non-biological motion trajectories. Prior accounts of the neurocognitive basis for prediction of these two motion classes may generally be divided into those that posit that non-biological motion trajectories are predicted using the same motor planning and/or simulation mechanisms used for human actions, and those that posit distinct mechanisms for each. Using brain lesion patients and healthy controls, this study examined critical neural substrates and behavioral correlates of human and non-biological motion prediction.

methodsTwenty-seven left hemisphere stroke patients and 13 neurologically intact controls performed a visual occlusion task requiring prediction of pantomimed tool use, real tool use, and non-biological motion videos. Patients were also assessed with measures of motor strength and speed, praxis, and action recognition.

resultsPrediction impairment for both human and non-biological motion was associated with limb apraxia and, weakly, with the severity of motor production deficits, but not with action recognition ability. Furthermore, impairment for human and non-biological motion prediction was equivalently associated with lesions in the left inferior parietal cortex, left dorsal frontal cortex, and the left insula.

conclusionsThese data suggest that motor planning mechanisms associated with specific loci in the sensorimotor network are critical for prediction of spatiotemporal trajectory information characteristic of both human and non-biological motions. (JINS, 2017, 23, 171-184).

Indexed as

Brain MappingAdultAgedApraxiasBrainFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMotion PerceptionNeuropsychological TestsPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeRegression AnalysisBiological motionDomain-generalDomain-specificForward modelHemiparesisInsulaLimb apraxiaMotor planningParietalPremotorSimulation

Identifiers

PMID28205497
PMCPMC5360459
OpenAlexW2588541885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.