Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28205146›Full record

ArticleCNS drugs2017

Binge Drinking: Current Diagnostic and Therapeutic Issues.

Benjamin Rolland, Mickaël Naassila

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in CNS drugs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Intensity of Daily Drinking and Its Relation to Alcohol Use Disorders.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin RollandINSERM-ERi 24 (GRAP), Centre Universitaire de Recherche en Santé, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, 80025, Amiens, France. benjrolland@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8666-3635
Mickaël NaassilaINSERM-ERi 24 (GRAP), Centre Universitaire de Recherche en Santé, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, 80025, Amiens, France.
Inserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of binge drinking (BD) refers to patterns of heavy episodic alcohol consumption, with BD primarily occurring among adolescents and young adults. Several official definitions of BD have been proposed, in particular by the World Health Organization, the National Institute on Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse, and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Nevertheless, none of these definitions address the psychosocial and medical consequences of the type of alcohol use seen in BD. In practice, BD can thus correspond to either hazardous or harmful use of alcohol (HUA), while the episodic nature of heavy drinking in BD means that it does not meet the criteria for 'alcohol dependence'. This diagnostic differentiation is important because it determines which type of intervention is recommended. Psychosocial, rather than pharmacological, interventions are recommended as first-line treatment for adults with HUA, while pharmacological treatment is recommended for alcohol dependence; however, HUA appears to be associated with much poorer outcomes in adolescents, which could thus warrant early use of pharmacotherapy in this patient group. For HUA, and especially in adolescents, there is currently a severe lack of data regarding the efficacy and safety of the different drugs that have been approved for adults with alcohol dependence. Various guidelines propose the use of drugs for some types of BD but that use remains off-label and empirical, which raises important safety and ethical concerns. Future research on BD should systematically assess the criteria for HUA to better differentiate its subtypes with actual consequences and better address the heterogeneity of BD in terms of both clinical profiles and outcomes. Regarding pharmacotherapy, some national guidelines have recommended nalmefene for 'mild' dependence or second-line treatment for HUA, but such recommendations are not supported by evidence. Only naltrexone has been investigated in HUA but not in adolescents. More clinical trials should be conducted among adolescents with BD and HUA criteria to determine the most appropriate use of drugs in this particularly vulnerable population of subjects.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinge DrinkingHumans

Identifiers

PMID28205146
OpenAlexW2588420583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.