Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28205030›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2017

Safety and feasibility of reduced-port robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a phase I/II clinical trial.

Seungho Lee, Jin Kyong Kim, Youn Nam Kim, Dong-Su Jang, Yoo Min Kim, Taeil Son, Woo Jin Hyung, Hyoung-Il Kim

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02347956 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

The Safety and Feasibility of Reduced Port Robotic Distal Gastrectomy Using Single-site for Surgical Treatment of Early Gastric Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2015 to 2015Enrolled19ConditionsGastric CancerArmsReduced port robotic distal gastrectomy
NCT03396354 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Comparison of Surgical Outcomes With Using Integrated Robotic Technology Versus Conventional Laparoscopy for Gastric Cancer Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2018 to 2023Enrolled140ConditionsGastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive GastrectomyArmsIntegrated robotic surgery, Conventional laparoscopic surgery
NCT04972149 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Cohort Study Comparing Surgeon Stress, Utilization of Surgical Instruments, Surgical Outcomes According to Surgical Approach for Gastrectomy

TypeobservationalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled250ConditionsGastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Gastrectomy
NCT05051670 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Safety and Feasibility of Reduced Port Robotic Distal Gastrectomy Using da Vinci SP for Early Gastric Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled19ConditionsGastric CancerArmsda vinc SP gastrectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. [Robotic gastrectomy: Research progress and practical challenges].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Fluorescence-guided Two-port Robotic Gastrectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Gastrectomy: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Trends in clinical outcomes and long-term survival after robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single high-volume center experience of consecutive 2000 patients.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Robotic Subtotal Gastrectomy with Small Remnant Stomach for Gastric Cancer in the Upper Stomach.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Seungho LeeDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, 120-752, Seoul, South Korea.
Jin Kyong KimDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, 120-752, Seoul, South Korea.
Youn Nam KimDepartment of Biostatistics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Dong-Su JangDepartment of Sculpture, Hongik University, Seoul, South Korea.
Yoo Min KimDepartment of Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, South Korea.
Taeil SonDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, 120-752, Seoul, South Korea.
Woo Jin HyungDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, 120-752, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyoung-Il KimDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, 120-752, Seoul, South Korea. cairus@yuhs.ac.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6134-4523
Yonsei University Health System · KRYonsei University · KRHongik University · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2013R1A1A1007706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTheoretically, reducing the number of ports required in minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer would further minimize trauma associated therewith. Advances in single-site surgery have afforded surgeons the ability to perform reduced-port distal gastrectomy via a robotic approach using the Single-Site™ system, eliminating restrictions on the movement of surgical instruments.

methodsThis phase I/II study was designed as a single-arm prospective trial of reduced-port robotic distal gastrectomy (RRDG) by a single surgeon (NCT02347956). From January to October 2015, 40 individuals scheduled to undergo robotic surgery for early gastric cancer were asked to participate in the trial. Nineteen were enrolled and underwent RRDG. The primary endpoints were 30-day morbidity and mortality.

resultsNo intraoperative event requiring conversion to laparoscopic or open surgery occurred, and no major complication was observed following RRDG (0.0% [80% CI (0.0-11.4%)]). Medians of operation time, blood loss, the number of retrieved lymph nodes, days until gas passing, and hospital stay were 190 min, 20 mL, 48, 3, and 5 days, respectively.

conclusionsDeemed safe and feasible through the present trial, RRDG could be a valid alternative to conventional robot distal gastrectomy for managing early gastric cancer. Our reduced-port robotic surgery using the Single-Site system and a third robotic arm could potentially be applicable as a highly advanced, minimally invasive surgery for other solid organ diseases.

Indexed as

GastrectomyLaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLength of StayLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeProspective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeEarly Gastric CancerIntuitive SurgicalNeedle DriverRetrieve Lymph NodeVisual Analogue Scale Score

Identifiers

PMID28205030
OpenAlexW2588821995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.