Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28204873›Full record

ReviewMedical microbiology and immunology2017

Dysbiosis a risk factor for celiac disease.

Anamaria Girbovan, Genel Sur, Gabriel Samasca, Iulia Lupan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical microbiology and immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Persistence of the ProbioticInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anamaria GirbovanDepartment of Immunology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Crisan Street, 3-5 No 400177, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Genel SurDepartment of Pediatrics II, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Gabriel SamascaDepartment of Immunology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Crisan Street, 3-5 No 400177, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Gabriel.Samasca@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7645-0716
Iulia LupanDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Celiac disease remains one of the most challenging pathologies of the small intestine. It involves multiple pathogenic pathways and there are no disease-changing pharmacological agents available against it yet. The term microbiota refers to the community of microorganisms that inhabit a particular region of the body. Normal gut microbiota has a vital role in maintaining the intestinal homeostasis and promoting health. Celiac disease is associated with microbiota alteration, especially with an increase in the number of Gram-negative bacteria and a decrease in the number of Gram-positive bacteria. There is a strong relationship between intestinal dysbiosis and celiac disease, and recent studies are aimed at determining whether the celiac disease is a risk factor for dysbiosis or dysbiosis is for celiac disease. Therefore, the aim of this review was to assess the latest findings regarding the gut microbiota and its impact on the celiac disease, including therapeutic aspects.

Indexed as

DysbiosisCeliac DiseaseDiet, Gluten-FreeGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotypeHLA AntigensHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansImmunity, MucosalImmunomodulationIntestinal MucosaLife StyleProbioticsRisk FactorsHLA AntigensCeliac diseaseDysbiosisIntestinal microbiotaProbiotics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.