Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28204787›Full record

ArticleSystematic biology2017

Inference of Evolutionary Jumps in Large Phylogenies using Lévy Processes.

Pablo Duchen, Christoph Leuenberger, Sándor M Szilágyi, Luke Harmon, Jonathan Eastman, Manuel Schweizer, Daniel Wegmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Protein Structural Phylogenetics.Genome biology and evolution · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Robust Phylogenetic Regression.Systematic biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Pulsed evolution shaped modern vertebrate body sizes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  20. Phylogenetic tests for evolutionary innovation: the problematic link between key innovations and exceptional diversification.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pablo DuchenFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Department of Biology, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 10, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.
Christoph LeuenbergerFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Department of Biology, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 10, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.
Sándor M SzilágyiFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Department of Informatics, University of Fribourg, Boulevard de Péroles 90, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.
Luke HarmonDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive MS 3051, 1700 Moscow-Idaho, United States.
Jonathan EastmanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive MS 3051, 1700 Moscow-Idaho, United States.
Manuel SchweizerNaturhistorisches Museum der Burgergemeinde Bern, Bernastrasse 15, 3005 Bern, Switzerland.
Daniel WegmannFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Department of Biology, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 10, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although it is now widely accepted that the rate of phenotypic evolution may not necessarily be constant across large phylogenies, the frequency and phylogenetic position of periods of rapid evolution remain unclear. In his highly influential view of evolution, G. G. Simpson supposed that such evolutionary jumps occur when organisms transition into so-called new adaptive zones, for instance after dispersal into a new geographic area, after rapid climatic changes, or following the appearance of an evolutionary novelty. Only recently, large, accurate and well calibrated phylogenies have become available that allow testing this hypothesis directly, yet inferring evolutionary jumps remains computationally very challenging. Here, we develop a computationally highly efficient algorithm to accurately infer the rate and strength of evolutionary jumps as well as their phylogenetic location. Following previous work we model evolutionary jumps as a compound process, but introduce a novel approach to sample jump configurations that does not require matrix inversions and thus naturally scales to large trees. We then make use of this development to infer evolutionary jumps in Anolis lizards and Loriinii parrots where we find strong signal for such jumps at the basis of clades that transitioned into new adaptive zones, just as postulated by Simpson's hypothesis. [evolutionary jump; Lévy process; phenotypic evolution; punctuated equilibrium; quantitative traits.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticPhylogenyAlgorithmsAnimalsBiological EvolutionClassificationLizardsParrots

Identifiers

PMID28204787
PMCPMC5790141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.