Trial reportPhysical therapy2017
Outcomes of Patients With Acute Low Back Pain Stratified by the STarT Back Screening Tool: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial.
Trial report in Physical therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exercise therapy for treatment of acute non-specific low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Changes in Pain Catastrophizing and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs as Mediators of Early Physical Therapy on Disability and Pain in Acute Low-Back Pain: A Secondary Analysis of a Clinical Trial.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2022Trial
- Implementation of an integrated primary care prevention and management program for chronic low back pain (LBP): patient-reported outcomes and predictors of pain interference after six months.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- The association of the STarT Back Screening Tool and type of leg pain with low back pain disability trajectories: a prospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Effect of low back pain on clinical-functional factors and its associated potential risk of chronicity in adolescent dancers of classical ballet: cross-sectional study.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Digital Rehabilitation for Acute Low Back Pain: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.Journal of pain research · 2022Article
- The Evolving Case Supporting Individualised Physiotherapy for Low Back Pain.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- The use of STarT BACK Screening Tool in emergency departments for patients with acute low back pain: a prospective inception cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018Article
- Use of the STarT Back Screening Tool in patients with chronic low back pain receiving physical therapy interventions.Brazilian journal of physical therapyArticle
- Baseline characteristics did not identify people with low back pain who respond best to a Movement System Impairment-Based classification treatment.Brazilian journal of physical therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The impact of physical therapy on the outcomes of patients with acute low back pain (LBP) stratified by the STart Back Screening Tool (SBST) is unclear. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients with acute LBP who were stratified as medium or high risk. Design: This was a secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Setting: Patients were recruited between March 2011 and November 2013 from primary care clinics in Salt Lake City, Utah. Participants: One hundred eighty-one participants with acute LBP who were stratified as medium risk (n = 120) or high risk (n = 61) by the SBST were included. They were aged 18 through 60 years, with duration of symptoms less than 16 days, no symptoms below the knee, no treatment for LBP in the past 6 months, and an Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of 20% or greater. Intervention: After participants received education on how to manage their LBP, they were randomized to receive usual care (n = 97) by their primary care provider or early intervention (n = 84) by a physical therapist. Measurements: The primary (3-month ODI score) outcome measure was obtained at baseline and at 4 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year. Results: No differences were detected in the effect of intervention between participants stratified as medium or high risk. For the high-risk subgroup, there was a significant difference between the early intervention and usual care groups for the 3-month ODI (mean difference = -5.87 [95% CI = -11.24, -0.50]) favoring early intervention. Limitations: The primary study was not designed to examine the SBST. Conclusions: Patients with acute LBP stratified as high risk seem likely to respond well to one session of education. They may experience additional benefit by 3 months from evidence-based physical therapy treatments. These effects disappear at 1 year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.