Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28204740›Full record

Trial reportPhysical therapy2017

Outcomes of Patients With Acute Low Back Pain Stratified by the STarT Back Screening Tool: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial.

John Magel, Julie M Fritz, Tom Greene, Per Kjaer, Robin L Marcus, Gerard P Brennan

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Physical therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exercise therapy for treatment of acute non-specific low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The use of STarT BACK Screening Tool in emergency departments for patients with acute low back pain: a prospective inception cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John Magel
Julie M Fritz
Tom Greene
Per Kjaer
Robin L Marcus
Gerard P Brennan
University of Utah · USIntermountain Healthcare · US

Funding

University of Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001067 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI DERE, WILLARD H., HESS, RACHEL · 2013 to 2017
$19.8M
Comparative Effectiveness of Management Strategies for Acute Low Back PainR18HS018672 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI FRITZ, JULIE M · 2010 to 2013
$1.7M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS018672NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The impact of physical therapy on the outcomes of patients with acute low back pain (LBP) stratified by the STart Back Screening Tool (SBST) is unclear. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients with acute LBP who were stratified as medium or high risk. Design: This was a secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Setting: Patients were recruited between March 2011 and November 2013 from primary care clinics in Salt Lake City, Utah. Participants: One hundred eighty-one participants with acute LBP who were stratified as medium risk (n = 120) or high risk (n = 61) by the SBST were included. They were aged 18 through 60 years, with duration of symptoms less than 16 days, no symptoms below the knee, no treatment for LBP in the past 6 months, and an Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of 20% or greater. Intervention: After participants received education on how to manage their LBP, they were randomized to receive usual care (n = 97) by their primary care provider or early intervention (n = 84) by a physical therapist. Measurements: The primary (3-month ODI score) outcome measure was obtained at baseline and at 4 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year. Results: No differences were detected in the effect of intervention between participants stratified as medium or high risk. For the high-risk subgroup, there was a significant difference between the early intervention and usual care groups for the 3-month ODI (mean difference = -5.87 [95% CI = -11.24, -0.50]) favoring early intervention. Limitations: The primary study was not designed to examine the SBST. Conclusions: Patients with acute LBP stratified as high risk seem likely to respond well to one session of education. They may experience additional benefit by 3 months from evidence-based physical therapy treatments. These effects disappear at 1 year.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesAcute PainAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePain MeasurementPatient Education as TopicRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID28204740
PMCPMC5804017
OpenAlexW2591545421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.