Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28204458›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal2017

The consensus of the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology concerning the clinical investigation of the use of autologous adult stem cells for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction and heart failure: update 2016.

Anthony Mathur, Francisco Fernández-Avilés, Stefanie Dimmeler, Christine Hauskeller, Stefan Janssens, Philippe Menasche, Wojtek Wojakowski, John F Martin, Andreas Zeiher, BAMI Investigators

Open access · bronzeAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cardiac fibrosis: potential therapeutic targets.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2019
    Review
  13. De motu cordis: the future of regenerative medicine.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Anthony MathurQueen Mary University of London.
Francisco Fernández-AvilésHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid.
Stefanie DimmelerJohann-Wolfgang-Goethe University, Frankfurt.
Christine HauskellerEgenis, Exeter Centre for the Study of Life Sciences, University of Exeter.
Stefan JanssensUniversity Hospitals Leuven.
Philippe MenascheAssistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris University Paris Descartes.
Wojtek WojakowskiMedical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
John F MartinUniversity College London.
Andreas ZeiherJohann-Wolfgang-Goethe University, Frankfurt.
BAMI Investigators
Goethe Institute · GBAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESMedical University of Silesia · PLQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

CardiologySocieties, MedicalAdult Stem CellsEuropeHeart FailureHumansMyocardial InfarctionStem Cell TransplantationTransplantation, Autologous

Identifiers

PMID28204458
PMCPMC5837487
OpenAlexW2588309279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.