Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28203387›Full record

ReviewMaternal health, neonatology and perinatology2017

An overview of available drugs for management of opioid abuse during pregnancy.

Jillian Laslo, Jon-Michael Brunner, Daniel Burns, Emily Butler, Autumn Cunningham, Ryan Killpack, Courtney Pyeritz, Kimberly Rinard, Jennifer Childers, Joseph Horzempa

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Opioid Dependence in Pregnancy.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2019
    Article
  6. Maternal buprenorphine treatment and infant outcome.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jillian LasloDepartment of Graduate Health Sciences, West Liberty University, West Liberty, WV USA.
Jon-Michael BrunnerDepartment of Graduate Health Sciences, West Liberty University, West Liberty, WV USA.
Daniel BurnsDepartment of Graduate Health Sciences, West Liberty University, West Liberty, WV USA.
Emily ButlerDepartment of Graduate Health Sciences, West Liberty University, West Liberty, WV USA.
Autumn CunninghamDepartment of Graduate Health Sciences, West Liberty University, West Liberty, WV USA.
Ryan KillpackDepartment of Graduate Health Sciences, West Liberty University, West Liberty, WV USA.
Courtney PyeritzDepartment of Graduate Health Sciences, West Liberty University, West Liberty, WV USA.
Kimberly RinardDepartment of Graduate Health Sciences, West Liberty University, West Liberty, WV USA.
Jennifer ChildersDepartment of Graduate Health Sciences, West Liberty University, West Liberty, WV USA.
Joseph HorzempaDepartment of Graduate Health Sciences, West Liberty University, West Liberty, WV USA.
West Liberty University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of opioid abuse in the United States has been steadily increasing over the last several years among many major demographics, including pregnant women. Rise in prenatal opioid abuse has resulted in subsequent escalation of neonatal abstinence syndrome incidence, prompting the US Congress to pass the Protecting Our Infants Act of 2015. This act specifically calls for a critical review of current treatment options for prenatal opioid abuse which may ultimately lead to the development of better therapies and a decreased incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome. Currently, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends methadone, buprenorphine, or buprenorphine/naloxone in the treatment of prenatal opioid abuse. In this review, each maintenance therapy treatment option is discussed and compared revealing inconsistencies in postpartum retention rates, effects on fetal development, and availability to patients due to restrictions in health care coverage. Although each of these treatment options reduces opioid abuse and potential negative outcomes for the fetus, the shortcomings of these drugs highlight the overarching need for an improved standard of care. Drug developers and lawmakers should consider that affordability, coverage by health insurance, and success in retention rates substantially impacts the decision of the patient and healthcare provider regarding utilization of a particular opioid maintenance therapy.

Indexed as

AbuseAddictionBuprenorphineBuprenorphine/naloxoneMethadoneNeonatalOpioidPregnancyPrenatalTreatment

Identifiers

PMID28203387
PMCPMC5303227
OpenAlexW2587746634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.