Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28203366›Full record

ArticleBiology of sex differences2017

Sex differences in variability across timescales in BALB/c mice.

Benjamin L Smarr, Azure D Grant, Irving Zucker, Brian J Prendergast, Lance J Kriegsfeld

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of sex differences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin L SmarrDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
Azure D GrantDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
Irving ZuckerDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
Brian J PrendergastDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA.
Lance J KriegsfeldDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
University of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

The role of kisspeptin and RFRP-3 in the neuroendocrine control of female reproductionR01HD050470 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI KRIEGSFELD, LANCE J · 2007 to 2022
$5.0M
The role of circadian stability during development in adult health and behaviorF32HD081957 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI SMARR, BENJAMIN LEE · 2014 to 2017
$172k
NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD081957NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD050470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFemales are markedly underinvestigated in the biological and behavioral sciences due to the presumption that cyclic hormonal changes across the ovulatory cycle introduce excess variability to measures of interest in comparison to males. However, recent analyses indicate that male and female mice and rats exhibit comparable variability across numerous physiological and behavioral measures, even when the stage of the estrous cycle is not considered. Hormonal changes across the ovulatory cycle likely contribute cyclic, intra-individual variability in females, but the source(s) of male variability has, to our knowledge, not been investigated. It is unclear whether male variability, like that of females, is temporally structured and, therefore, quantifiable and predictable. Finally, whether males and females exhibit variability on similar time scales has not been explored.

methodsThese questions were addressed by collecting chronic, high temporal resolution locomotor activity (LA) and core body temperature (CBT) data from male and female BALB/c mice.

resultsContrary to expectation, males are more variable than females over the course of the day (diel variability) and exhibit higher intra-individual daily range than females in both LA and CBT. Between mice of a given sex, variability is comparable for LA but the inter-individual daily range in CBT is greater for males. To identify potential rhythmic processes contributing to these sex differences, we employed wavelet transformations across a range of periodicities (1-39 h).

conclusionsAlthough variability in circadian power is comparable between the sexes for both LA and CBT, infradian variability is greater in females and ultradian variability is greater in males. Thus, exclusion of female mice from studies because of estrous cycle variability may increase variance in investigations where only male measures are collected over a span of several hours and limit generalization of findings from males to females.

Indexed as

PeriodicitySex CharacteristicsAnimalsBody TemperatureFemaleLocomotionMaleMice, Inbred BALB CBiological rhythmsEstrous cyclesLongitudinal dataOvulationTemporal structureTime series analysisWavelets

Identifiers

PMID28203366
PMCPMC5301430
OpenAlexW2587536223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.