Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28203051›Full record

ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2017

A review and update on orphan drugs for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis.

Caiyun You, Haitham F Sahawneh, Lina Ma, Buraa Kubaisi, Alexander Schmidt, C Stephen Foster

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Microbiome in Immune-Mediated Uveitis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. I-aMediators of inflammation · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. [Pharmacological treatment strategies and surgical options for uveitis].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. CD83Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Caiyun YouMassachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institution (MERSI), Waltham; Ocular Immunology and Uveitis Foundation, Weston, MA, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Haitham F SahawnehMassachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institution (MERSI), Waltham; Ocular Immunology and Uveitis Foundation, Weston, MA, USA.
Lina MaMassachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institution (MERSI), Waltham; Ocular Immunology and Uveitis Foundation, Weston, MA, USA.
Buraa KubaisiMassachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institution (MERSI), Waltham; Ocular Immunology and Uveitis Foundation, Weston, MA, USA.
Alexander SchmidtMassachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institution (MERSI), Waltham; Ocular Immunology and Uveitis Foundation, Weston, MA, USA.
C Stephen FosterMassachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institution (MERSI), Waltham; Ocular Immunology and Uveitis Foundation, Weston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Ocular Immunology and Uveitis Foundation · USTianjin Medical University General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUveitis, a leading cause of preventable blindness around the world, is a critically underserved disease in regard to the medications approved for use. Multiple immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) drugs are appropriate for uveitis therapy but are still off-label. These IMT agents, including antimetabolites, calcineurin inhibitors, alkylating agents, and biologic agents, have been designated as "orphan drugs" and are widely used for systemic autoimmune diseases or organ transplantation. AREA COVERED: The purpose of this paper is to comprehensively review and summarize the approved orphan drugs and biologics that are being used to treat systemic diseases and to discuss drugs that have not yet received approval as an "orphan drug for treating uveitis" by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). OUR PERSPECTIVE: IMT, as a steroid-sparing agent for uveitis patients, has shown promising clinical results. Refractory and recurrent uveitis requires combination IMT agents. IMT is continued for a period of 2 years while the patient is in remission before considering tapering medication. Our current goals include developing further assessments regarding the efficacy, optimal dose, and safety in efforts to achieve FDA approval for "on-label" use of current IMT agents and biologics more quickly and to facilitate insurance coverage and expand access to the products for this orphan disease.

Indexed as

immunomodulatoryorphan drugsteroid sparinguveitis

Identifiers

PMID28203051
PMCPMC5298311
OpenAlexW2583579301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.