Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28202895›Full record

ReviewAnnals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia2017

Conduits Used in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Review of Morphological Studies.

Brenda Martínez-González, Cynthia Guadalupe Reyes-Hernández, Alejandro Quiroga-Garza, Víctor E Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Claudia N Esparza-Hernández, Rodrigo E Elizondo-Omaña, Santos Guzmán-López

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Coronary Artery Surgery: Past, Present, and Future.Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Strategies for surface coatings of implantable cardiac medical devices.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brenda Martínez-GonzálezFaculty of Medicine, Human Anatomy Department and University Hospital "Dr. Jose Eleuterio González", Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo León (UANL), Monterrey NL, Mexico.
Cynthia Guadalupe Reyes-HernándezFaculty of Medicine, Human Anatomy Department and University Hospital "Dr. Jose Eleuterio González", Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo León (UANL), Monterrey NL, Mexico.
Alejandro Quiroga-GarzaFaculty of Medicine, Human Anatomy Department and University Hospital "Dr. Jose Eleuterio González", Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo León (UANL), Monterrey NL, Mexico.
Víctor E Rodríguez-RodríguezFaculty of Medicine, Human Anatomy Department and University Hospital "Dr. Jose Eleuterio González", Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo León (UANL), Monterrey NL, Mexico.
Claudia N Esparza-HernándezFaculty of Medicine, Human Anatomy Department and University Hospital "Dr. Jose Eleuterio González", Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo León (UANL), Monterrey NL, Mexico.
Rodrigo E Elizondo-OmañaFaculty of Medicine, Human Anatomy Department and University Hospital "Dr. Jose Eleuterio González", Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo León (UANL), Monterrey NL, Mexico.
Santos Guzmán-LópezFaculty of Medicine, Human Anatomy Department and University Hospital "Dr. Jose Eleuterio González", Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo León (UANL), Monterrey NL, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a significant variety of vascular conduits options for coronary bypass surgery. Adequate graft selection is the most important factor for the success of the intervention. To ensure durability, permeability, and bypass function, there must be a morphological similarity between the graft and the coronary artery. The objective of this review was to analyze the morphological characteristics of the grafts that are most commonly used in coronary bypass surgery and the coronary arteries that are most frequently occluded. We included clinical information regarding the characteristics that determine the behavior of the grafts and its permeability over time. Currently, the internal thoracic artery is the standard choice for bypass surgery because of the morphological characteristics of the wall that makes less prone to developing atherosclerosis and hyperplasia. The radial and right gastroepiploic arteries are the following second and third best options, respectively. The ulnar artery is the preferred choice when other conduits are not feasible.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery BypassCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsGastroepiploic ArteryGraft Occlusion, VascularHumansMammary ArteriesRadial ArteryRisk FactorsSaphenous VeinTreatment OutcomeUlnar ArteryVascular Patencyconduitscoronary artery bypass graftinghistologymorphologypermeability

Identifiers

PMID28202895
PMCPMC5422630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.