Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28202808›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2017

A broad-scale comparison of aerobic activity levels in vertebrates: endotherms versus ectotherms.

James F Gillooly, Juan Pablo Gomez, Evgeny V Mavrodiev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Per capita sperm metabolism is density dependent.The Journal of experimental biology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The metabolic rate of the biosphere and its components.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Using Mouse andInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James F GilloolyDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA gillooly@ufl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8516-3268
Juan Pablo GomezDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Evgeny V MavrodievFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differences in the limits and range of aerobic activity levels between endotherms and ectotherms remain poorly understood, though such differences help explain basic differences in species' lifestyles (e.g. movement patterns, feeding modes, and interaction rates). We compare the limits and range of aerobic activity in endotherms (birds and mammals) and ectotherms (fishes, reptiles, and amphibians) by evaluating the body mass-dependence of VO

Indexed as

Oxygen ConsumptionAerobiosisAmphibiansAnimalsBirdsFishesMammalsPhylogenyReptilesmetabolic ratemetabolic theoryrespirationscalingVO2 max

Identifiers

PMID28202808
PMCPMC5326522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.