ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2017
The genetics of mate preferences in hybrids between two young and sympatric Lake Victoria cichlid species.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Increased rates of hybridization in swordtails are associated with water pollution.Current biology : CB · 2026Article
- Increased rates of hybridization in swordtails are associated with water pollution.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The neurodevelopmental genes alan shepard and Neuroglian contribute to female mate preference in African Drosophila melanogaster.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2024Article
- Differences among reciprocal hybrids ofHydrobiologia · 2023Article
- Implications of size-selective fisheries on sexual selection.Evolutionary applications · 2020Article
- Genetic architecture of a key reproductive isolation trait differs between sympatric and non-sympatric sister species of Lake Victoria cichlids.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020Article
- Inbreeding load and inbreeding depression estimated from lifetime reproductive success in a small, dispersal-limited population.Heredity · 2019Article
- Endless forms of sexual selection.PeerJ · 2019Article
- Understanding explosive diversification through cichlid fish genomics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2018Review
- The genetics of mate preferences in hybrids between two young and sympatric Lake Victoria cichlid species.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The genetic architecture of mate preferences is likely to affect significant evolutionary processes, including speciation and hybridization. Here, we investigate laboratory hybrids between a pair of sympatric Lake Victoria cichlid fish species that appear to have recently evolved from a hybrid population between similar predecessor species. The species demonstrate strong assortative mating in the laboratory, associated with divergent male breeding coloration (red dorsum versus blue). We show in a common garden experiment, using DNA-based paternity testing, that the strong female mate preferences among males of the two species are fully recovered in a large fraction of their F2 hybrid generation. Individual hybrid females often demonstrated consistent preferences in multiple mate choice trials (more than or equal to five) across a year or more. This result suggests that female mate preference is influenced by relatively few major genes or genomic regions. These preferences were not changed by experience of a successful spawning event with a male of the non-preferred species in a no-choice single-male trial. We found no evidence for imprinting in the F2 hybrids, although the F1 hybrid females may have been imprinted on their mothers. We discuss this nearly Mendelian inheritance of consistent innate mate preferences in the context of speciation theory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.