Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28202783›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2018

Evaluation of a complex healthcare intervention to increase smoking cessation in pregnant women: interrupted time series analysis with economic evaluation.

Ruth Bell, Svetlana V Glinianaia, Zelda van der Waal, Andrew Close, Eoin Moloney, Susan Jones, Vera Araújo-Soares, Sharon Hamilton, Eugene Mg Milne, Janet Shucksmith and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ruth BellInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Svetlana V GlinianaiaInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Zelda van der WaalSchool of Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Andrew CloseSchool of Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Eoin MoloneyInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Susan JonesHealth and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Vera Araújo-SoaresInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Sharon HamiltonHealth and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Eugene Mg MilneNewcastle City Council, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Janet ShucksmithHealth and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Luke ValeInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Martyn WillmoreFresh, Smoke Free North East, Durham, UK.
Martin WhiteMRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Steven RushtonSchool of Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Newcastle University · GBTeesside University · GBFresh Science · AUNewcastle City Council · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKDepartment of HealthMedical Research Council MR/K023187/1Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of a complex intervention to improve referral and treatment of pregnant smokers in routine practice, and to assess the incremental costs to the National Health Service (NHS) per additional woman quitting smoking.

designInterrupted time series analysis of routine data before and after introducing the intervention, within-study economic evaluation.

settingEight acute NHS hospital trusts and 12 local authority areas in North East England.

participants37 726 records of singleton delivery including 10 594 to mothers classified as smoking during pregnancy.

interventionsA package of measures implemented in trusts and smoking cessation services, aimed at increasing the proportion of pregnant smokers quitting during pregnancy, comprising skills training for healthcare and smoking cessation staff; universal carbon monoxide monitoring with routine opt-out referral for smoking cessation support; provision of carbon monoxide monitors and supporting materials; and an explicit referral pathway and follow-up protocol.

main outcome measuresReferrals to smoking cessation services; probability of quitting smoking during pregnancy; additional costs to health services; incremental cost per additional woman quitting.

resultsAfter introduction of the intervention, the referral rate increased more than twofold (incidence rate ratio=2.47, 95% CI 2.16 to 2.81) and the probability of quitting by delivery increased (adjusted OR=1.81, 95% CI 1.54 to 2.12). The additional cost per delivery was £31 and the incremental cost per additional quit was £952; 31 pregnant women needed to be treated for each additional quitter.

conclusionsThe implementation of a system-wide complex healthcare intervention was associated with significant increase in rates of quitting by delivery.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCarbon MonoxideEnglandFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisLongitudinal StudiesPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsReferral and ConsultationSmokingSmoking CessationSmoking PreventionYoung AdultCarbon Monoxideeconomic evaluationguidelinesimplementationnatural experimental evaluationpregnancysmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID28202783
PMCPMC5801649
OpenAlexW2589010054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.