ArticleJournal of virology2017
Relationship between Measures of HIV Reactivation and Decline of the Latent Reservoir under Latency-Reversing Agents.
Article in Journal of virology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- AZD5582 robustly reactivates latently infected cells and clears the majority of those reactivated from the SIV reservoir.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Selective elimination of myeloid HIV reservoirs by targeting pro-survival pathways.The Journal of infection · 2026Article
- Modelling HIV-1 control and remission.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Review
- Upstream Stimulatory Factors Regulate HIV-1 Latency and Are Required for Robust T Cell Activation.Viruses · 2023Article
- Healthy dynamics of CD4 T cells may drive HIV resurgence in perinatally-infected infants on antiretroviral therapy.PLoS pathogens · 2022Article
- Evolving Strategies to Eliminate the CD4 T Cells HIV Viral ReservoirFrontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- HIV-Infected Macrophages Are Infected and Killed by the Interferon-Sensitive Rhabdovirus MG1.Journal of virology · 2021Article
- Prolonged administration of maraviroc reactivates latent HIV in vivo but it does not prevent antiretroviral-free viral rebound.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Article
- Strategies to eradicate HIV from infected patients: elimination of latent provirus reservoirs.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019Review
- Latency reversal agents affect differently the latent reservoir present in distinct CD4+ T subpopulations.PLoS pathogens · 2019Article
- Impact of Early Antiretroviral Therapy on Detection of Cell-Associated HIV-1 Nucleic Acid in Blood by the Roche Cobas TaqMan Test.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019Observational
- Determinants of the efficacy of HIV latency-reversing agents and implications for drug and treatment design.JCI insight · 2018Article
- Modeling HIV persistence and cure studies.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2018Review
- Insight into treatment of HIV infection from viral dynamics models.Immunological reviews · 2018Review
- The Oncolytic Virus MG1 Targets and Eliminates Cells Latently Infected With HIV-1: Implications for an HIV Cure.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2018Article
- Modeling Kick-Kill Strategies toward HIV Cure.Frontiers in immunology · 2017Review
- Mathematical Models of HIV Latency.Current topics in microbiology and immunologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antiretroviral-free HIV remission requires substantial reduction of the number of latently infected cells and enhanced immune control of viremia. Latency-reversing agents (LRAs) aim to eliminate latently infected cells by increasing the rate of reactivation of HIV transcription, which exposes these cells to killing by the immune system. As LRAs are explored in clinical trials, it becomes increasingly important to assess the effect of an increased HIV reactivation rate on the decline of latently infected cells and to estimate LRA efficacy in increasing virus reactivation. However, whether the extent of HIV reactivation is a good predictor of the rate of decline of the number of latently infected cells is dependent on a number of factors. Our modeling shows that the mechanisms of maintenance and clearance of the reservoir, the life span of cells with reactivated HIV, and other factors may significantly impact the relationship between measures of HIV reactivation and the decline in the number of latently infected cells. The usual measures of HIV reactivation are the increase in cell-associated HIV RNA (CA RNA) and/or plasma HIV RNA soon after administration. We analyze two recent studies where CA RNA was used to estimate the impact of two novel LRAs, panobinostat and romidepsin. Both drugs increased the CA RNA level 3- to 4-fold in clinical trials. However, cells with panobinostat-reactivated HIV appeared long-lived (half-life > 1 month), suggesting that the HIV reactivation rate increased by approximately 8%. With romidepsin, the life span of cells that reactivated HIV was short (2 days), suggesting that the HIV reactivation rate may have doubled under treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.