Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28202731›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Microfluidic droplet platform for ultrahigh-throughput single-cell screening of biodiversity.

Stanislav S Terekhov, Ivan V Smirnov, Anastasiya V Stepanova, Tatyana V Bobik, Yuliana A Mokrushina, Natalia A Ponomarenko, Alexey A Belogurov, Maria P Rubtsova, Olga V Kartseva, Marina O Gomzikova and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Chemical neighborhood exploration for substrate discovery in biocatalysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Precise loading of scarce reagents on droplet microarrays.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Animal Microbiomes as a Source of Novel Antibiotic-Producing Strains.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Stanislav S TerekhovShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russian Federation.
Ivan V SmirnovShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russian Federation.
Anastasiya V StepanovaShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russian Federation.
Tatyana V BobikShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russian Federation.
Yuliana A MokrushinaShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russian Federation.
Natalia A PonomarenkoShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russian Federation.
Alexey A BelogurovShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russian Federation.
Maria P RubtsovaDepartment of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russian Federation.
Olga V KartsevaKazan Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russian Federation.
Marina O GomzikovaKazan Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russian Federation.
Alexey A MoskovtsevInstitute of General Pathology and Pathophysiology, 125315 Moscow, Russian Federation.
Anton S BukatinSt. Petersburg Academic University, 194021 St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Michael V DubinaSt. Petersburg Academic University, 194021 St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Elena S KostryukovaResearch and Clinical Centre of Physical-Chemical Medicine, 119435 Moscow, Russian Federation.
Vladislav V BabenkoResearch and Clinical Centre of Physical-Chemical Medicine, 119435 Moscow, Russian Federation.
Maria T VakhitovaMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 141701 Dolgoprudny, Russian Federation.
Alexander I ManolovResearch and Clinical Centre of Physical-Chemical Medicine, 119435 Moscow, Russian Federation.
Maja V MalakhovaResearch and Clinical Centre of Physical-Chemical Medicine, 119435 Moscow, Russian Federation.
Maria A KornienkoResearch and Clinical Centre of Physical-Chemical Medicine, 119435 Moscow, Russian Federation.
Alexander V TyakhtResearch and Clinical Centre of Physical-Chemical Medicine, 119435 Moscow, Russian Federation.
Anna A VanyushkinaResearch and Clinical Centre of Physical-Chemical Medicine, 119435 Moscow, Russian Federation.
Elena N IlinaResearch and Clinical Centre of Physical-Chemical Medicine, 119435 Moscow, Russian Federation.
Patrick MassonKazan Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russian Federation.
Alexander G GabibovShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russian Federation; gabibov@mx.ibch.ru sidney.altman@yale.edu.
Sidney AltmanDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520 gabibov@mx.ibch.ru sidney.altman@yale.edu.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrahigh-throughput screening (uHTS) techniques can identify unique functionality from millions of variants. To mimic the natural selection mechanisms that occur by compartmentalization in vivo, we developed a technique based on single-cell encapsulation in droplets of a monodisperse microfluidic double water-in-oil-in-water emulsion (MDE). Biocompatible MDE enables in-droplet cultivation of different living species. The combination of droplet-generating machinery with FACS followed by next-generation sequencing and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of the secretomes of encapsulated organisms yielded detailed genotype/phenotype descriptions. This platform was probed with uHTS for biocatalysts anchored to yeast with enrichment close to the theoretically calculated limit and cell-to-cell interactions. MDE-FACS allowed the identification of human butyrylcholinesterase mutants that undergo self-reactivation after inhibition by the organophosphorus agent paraoxon. The versatility of the platform allowed the identification of bacteria, including slow-growing oral microbiota species that suppress the growth of a common pathogen,

Indexed as

AntibiosisBiodiversityButyrylcholinesteraseCell CommunicationEmulsionsFlow CytometryGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesOils, VolatileParaoxonPhenotypeSingle-Cell AnalysisStaphylococcus aureusButyrylcholinesteraseEmulsionsOils, VolatileParaoxonWaterbutyrylcholinesterasecell–cell interactionsmicrofluidic encapsulationStaphylococcus aureusultrahigh-throughput screening

Identifiers

PMID28202731
PMCPMC5347554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.