Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28202714›Full record

ArticleLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2017

Recollection-dependent memory for event duration in large-scale spatial navigation.

Iva K Brunec, Jason D Ozubko, Morgan D Barense, Morris Moscovitch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Iva K BrunecDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4228-2838
Jason D OzubkoRotman Research Institute at Baycrest, Toronto, Ontario M6A 2E1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7241-5331
Morgan D BarenseDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G3, Canada.
Morris MoscovitchDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6215-0440

Funding

CIHR MOP49566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Time and space represent two key aspects of episodic memories, forming the spatiotemporal context of events in a sequence. Little is known, however, about how temporal information, such as the duration and the order of particular events, are encoded into memory, and if it matters whether the memory representation is based on recollection or familiarity. To investigate this issue, we used a real world virtual reality navigation paradigm where periods of navigation were interspersed with pauses of different durations. Crucially, participants were able to reliably distinguish the durations of events that were subjectively "reexperienced" (i.e., recollected), but not of those that were familiar. This effect was not found in temporal order (ordinal) judgments. We also show that the active experience of the passage of time (holding down a key while waiting) moderately enhanced duration memory accuracy. Memory for event duration, therefore, appears to rely on the hippocampally supported ability to recollect or reexperience an event enabling the reinstatement of both its duration and its spatial context, to distinguish it from other events in a sequence. In contrast, ordinal memory appears to rely on familiarity and recollection to a similar extent.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleHumansJudgmentMaleMemory, EpisodicMental RecallNeuropsychological TestsReaction TimeRecognition, PsychologySpatial NavigationTime FactorsTime PerceptionUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID28202714
PMCPMC5311383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.