Differential regulation of NMDA receptors by d-serine and glycine in mammalian spinal locomotor networks.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Serine administration as a novel prophylactic approach to reduce the severity of acute pancreatitis during diabetes in mice.Diabetologia · 2020
   Article
2. Investigating brain d-serine: Advocacy for good practices.Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2019
   Review
3. Gliotransmission and adenosinergic modulation: insights from mammalian spinal motor networks.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017
   Review
4. Serine racemase interaction with N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors antagonist reveals potential alternative target of chronic pain treatment: Molecular docking study.Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as