Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28202146›Full record

ArticleSocial science research2017

Self-rated health at the intersection of sexual identity and union status.

Corinne Reczek, Hui Liu, Russell Spiker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Self-rated health and inflammation: Associations among partnered sexual minority and heterosexual adults.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Who's Worried? Memory, Worries About Dementia, and Marital Strain in Midlife Same- and Different-Sex Marriages: A Dyadic Perspective.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Corinne ReczekDepartment of Sociology and Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Electronic address: reczek.2@osu.edu.
Hui LiuDepartment of Sociology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Russell SpikerDepartment of Sociology, The University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA.

Funding

Institute for Population ResearchP2CHD058484 · NICHD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HAYFORD, SARAH R · 2014 to 2023
$5.0M
How Does Marriage Get Under the Skin? An Integrative Social and Biological ApproaK01AG043417 · NIA · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LIU, HUI · 2014 to 2018
$620k
Same-sex Family Structures and Child Health: The Role of Family ResourcesR03HD078754 · NICHD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LIU, HUI, RECZEK, RIN · 2014 to 2015
$187k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG043417NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD058484NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD078754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a well-established relationship between union status and health within the general population, and growing evidence of an association between sexual identity and well-being. Yet, what is unknown is whether union status stratifies health outcomes across sexual identity categories. In order to elucidate this question, we analyzed nationally representative population-based data from the National Health Interview Surveys 2013-2014 (N = 53,135) to examine variation in self-rated health by sexual partnership status (i.e., by sexual identity across union status). We further test the role of socioeconomic status and gender in these associations. Results from logistic regression models show that union status stratifies self-rated health across gay, lesbian, and heterosexual populations, albeit in different ways for men and women. Socioeconomic status does not play a major role in accounting for these differences. Findings highlight the need for specific interventions with lesbian women, who appear to experience the most strident disadvantage across union status categories.

Indexed as

GenderSelf-rated healthSexual minoritiesUnion status

Identifiers

PMID28202146
PMCPMC5319733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.