Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28202080›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2017

Mentholation affects the cigarette microbiota by selecting for bacteria resistant to harsh environmental conditions and selecting against potential bacterial pathogens.

Jessica Chopyk, Suhana Chattopadhyay, Prachi Kulkarni, Emma Claye, Kelsey R Babik, Molly C Reid, Eoghan M Smyth, Lauren E Hittle, Joseph N Paulson, Raul Cruz-Cano and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Viable, Multi-Drug-Resistant Bacteria Recovered from E-Liquids Used with Commercial Electronic Cigarettes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Microbiology of the American Smokeless Tobacco.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica ChopykMaryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD, USA.
Suhana ChattopadhyayMaryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD, USA.
Prachi KulkarniMaryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD, USA.
Emma ClayeMaryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD, USA.
Kelsey R BabikMaryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD, USA.
Molly C ReidMaryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD, USA.
Eoghan M SmythMaryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD, USA.
Lauren E HittleSchool of Medicine, Institute for Genome Sciences and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland, 801 West Baltimore Street, Office #622, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Joseph N PaulsonCenter for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Raul Cruz-CanoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD, USA.
Mihai PopCenter for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Stephanie S BuehlerPublic Health Center for Tobacco Research, Battelle, Columbus, OH, USA.
Pamela I ClarkDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD, USA.
Amy R SapkotaMaryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD, USA.
Emmanuel F MongodinSchool of Medicine, Institute for Genome Sciences and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland, 801 West Baltimore Street, Office #622, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. emongodin@som.umaryland.edu.
University of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USBattelle · US

Funding

Rapid Response Characterization of New and Manipulated Tobacco ProductsP50CA180523 · NCI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI CLARK, PAMELA I · 2013 to 2017
$19.0M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA180523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a paucity of data regarding the microbial constituents of tobacco products and their impacts on public health. Moreover, there has been no comparative characterization performed on the bacterial microbiota associated with the addition of menthol, an additive that has been used by tobacco manufacturers for nearly a century. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted bacterial community profiling on tobacco from user- and custom-mentholated/non-mentholated cigarette pairs, as well as a commercially-mentholated product. Total genomic DNA was extracted using a multi-step enzymatic and mechanical lysis protocol followed by PCR amplification of the V3-V4 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene from five cigarette products (18 cigarettes per product for a total of 90 samples): Camel Crush, user-mentholated Camel Crush, Camel Kings, custom-mentholated Camel Kings, and Newport Menthols. Sequencing was performed on the Illumina MiSeq platform and sequences were processed using the Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) software package.

resultsIn all products, Pseudomonas was the most abundant genera and included Pseudomonas oryzihabitans and Pseudomonas putida, regardless of mentholation status. However, further comparative analysis of the five products revealed significant differences in the bacterial compositions across products. Bacterial community richness was higher among non-mentholated products compared to those that were mentholated, particularly those that were custom-mentholated. In addition, mentholation appeared to be correlated with a reduction in potential human bacterial pathogens and an increase in bacterial species resistant to harsh environmental conditions.

conclusionsTaken together, these data provide preliminary evidence that the mentholation of commercially available cigarettes can impact the bacterial community of these products.

Indexed as

SmokingBacteriaBlack or African AmericanDNA, BacterialHumansMentholMicrobiotaPolymerase Chain ReactionPseudomonasRNA, Ribosomal, 16STobacco ProductsDNA, BacterialMentholRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNACigaretteMentholMicrobiotaPathogensTobacco

Identifiers

PMID28202080
PMCPMC5312438
OpenAlexW2587839382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.