Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28202049›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2017

Costs and benefits of natural transformation in Acinetobacter baylyi.

Nils Hülter, Vidar Sørum, Kristina Borch-Pedersen, Mikkel M Liljegren, Ane L G Utnes, Raul Primicerio, Klaus Harms, Pål J Johnsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Type IV Pilus-Mediated Inhibition ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. TnMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Carrying Capacity and Colonization Dynamics ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  17. Basic Characterization of Natural Transformation in a Highly TransformableFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Nils HülterGenomic Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Am Botanischen Garten 11, 24118, Kiel, Germany.
Vidar SørumDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, P.O. Box 6050 Langnes, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7327-6751
Kristina Borch-PedersenDepartment of Food Safety and Infection Biology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 8146 Dep, 0033, Oslo, Norway.
Mikkel M LiljegrenCentre for Ecolgical and Evolutionary Synthesis, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1066 Blindern, 0316, Oslo, Norway.
Ane L G UtnesDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, P.O. Box 6050 Langnes, Tromsø, Norway.
Raul PrimicerioDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, P.O. Box 6050 Langnes, Tromsø, Norway.
Klaus HarmsDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, P.O. Box 6050 Langnes, Tromsø, Norway. klaus.harms@spdir.net.
Pål J JohnsenDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, P.O. Box 6050 Langnes, Tromsø, Norway. paal.johnsen@uit.no.
UiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DENorwegian University of Life Sciences · NOUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

European Research Council 281357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNatural transformation enables acquisition of adaptive traits and drives genome evolution in prokaryotes. Yet, the selective forces responsible for the evolution and maintenance of natural transformation remain elusive since taken-up DNA has also been hypothesized to provide benefits such as nutrients or templates for DNA repair to individual cells.

resultsWe investigated the immediate effects of DNA uptake and recombination on the naturally competent bacterium Acinetobacter baylyi in both benign and genotoxic conditions. In head-to-head competition experiments between DNA uptake-proficient and -deficient strains, we observed a fitness benefit of DNA uptake independent of UV stress. This benefit was found with both homologous and heterologous DNA and was independent of recombination. Recombination with taken-up DNA reduced survival of transformed cells with increasing levels of UV-stress through interference with nucleotide excision repair, suggesting that DNA strand breaks occur during recombination attempts with taken-up DNA. Consistent with this, we show that absence of RecBCD and RecFOR recombinational DNA repair pathways strongly decrease natural transformation.

conclusionsOur data show a physiological benefit of DNA uptake unrelated to recombination. In contrast, recombination during transformation is a strand break inducing process that represents a previously unrecognized cost of natural transformation.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionCost-Benefit AnalysisAcinetobacterBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA DamageDNA RepairExodeoxyribonuclease VGene DeletionGenes, BacterialGene Transfer, HorizontalMembrane ProteinsMutationPhenotypeRecombination, GeneticStress, PhysiologicalBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDprA protein, bacteriaExodeoxyribonuclease VMembrane ProteinsBacterial evolutionCompetenceDNA repairDprAHorizontal gene transferNatural transformation

Identifiers

PMID28202049
PMCPMC5312590
OpenAlexW2588469766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.