Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28202044›Full record

ReviewParasites & vectors2017

The history of leishmaniasis.

Dietmar Steverding

Open access · goldAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Parasites & vectors, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 189 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
189citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
31.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

189 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 497 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Flavonoids in the treatment ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Can floral nectars reduce transmission of Leishmania?PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Insights into animal reservoir hosts for the circulation ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Adenosine/AmBio · 2026
    Article

129 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dietmar SteverdingBob Champion Research & Education Building, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, James Watson Road, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK. dsteverding@hotmail.com.
Norwich Research Park · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review article the history of leishmaniasis is discussed regarding the origin of the genus Leishmania in the Mesozoic era and its subsequent geographical distribution, initial evidence of the disease in ancient times, first accounts of the infection in the Middle Ages, and the discovery of Leishmania parasites as causative agents of leishmaniasis in modern times. With respect to the origin and dispersal of Leishmania parasites, the three currently debated hypotheses (Palaearctic, Neotropical and supercontinental origin, respectively) are presented. Ancient documents and paleoparasitological data indicate that leishmaniasis was already widespread in antiquity. Identification of Leishmania parasites as etiological agents and sand flies as the transmission vectors of leishmaniasis started at the beginning of the 20

Indexed as

AnimalsFossilsHistory, 16th CenturyHistory, 17th CenturyHistory, 18th CenturyHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHistory, AncientHumansLeishmaniaLeishmaniasisHistoryLeishmaniaLeishmaniasis

Identifiers

PMID28202044
PMCPMC5312593
OpenAlexW2588048627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.