ArticleGenome biology2017
Transcriptomic signatures shaped by cell proportions shed light on comparative developmental biology.
Article in Genome biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Degrees of convergent evolution in rodent adaptations to arid environments.Genome research · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic atlas throughout Coccidioides development reveals key phase-enriched transcripts of this important fungal pathogen.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Comparative transcriptomics in serial organs uncovers early and pan-organ developmental changes associated with organ-specific morphological adaptation.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Transcriptomic atlas of the morphologic development of the fungal pathogenbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- PRX1-positive mesenchymal stem cells drive molar morphogenesis.International journal of oral science · 2024Article
- Real age prediction from the transcriptome with RAPToR.Nature methods · 2022Article
- Comparative transcriptome profiles of human dental pulp stem cells from maxillary and mandibular teeth.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- System-level analyses of keystone genes required for mammalian tooth development.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2021Article
- Towards reconstructing the ancestral brain gene-network regulating caste differentiation in ants.Nature ecology & evolution · 2018Article
- Methylation of Cdkn1c may be involved in the regulation of tooth development through cell cycle inhibition.Journal of molecular histology · 2018Article
- Transcriptional correlates of proximal-distal identify and regeneration timing in axolotl limbs.Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP · 2018Article
- It's about time: studying gene regulatory programs across serial organs.Genome biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComparative transcriptomics can answer many questions in developmental and evolutionary developmental biology. Most transcriptomic studies start by showing global patterns of variation in transcriptomes that differ between species or organs through developmental time. However, little is known about the kinds of expression differences that shape these patterns.
resultsWe compared transcriptomes during the development of two morphologically distinct serial organs, the upper and lower first molars of the mouse. We found that these two types of teeth largely share the same gene expression dynamics but that three major transcriptomic signatures distinguish them, all of which are shaped by differences in the relative abundance of different cell types. First, lower/upper molar differences are maintained throughout morphogenesis and stem from differences in the relative abundance of mesenchyme and from constant differences in gene expression within tissues. Second, there are clear time-shift differences in the transcriptomes of the two molars related to cusp tissue abundance. Third, the transcriptomes differ most during early-mid crown morphogenesis, corresponding to exaggerated morphogenetic processes in the upper molar involving fewer mitotic cells but more migrating cells. From these findings, we formulate hypotheses about the mechanisms enabling the two molars to reach different phenotypes. We also successfully applied our approach to forelimb and hindlimb development.
conclusionsGene expression in a complex tissue reflects not only transcriptional regulation but also abundance of different cell types. This knowledge provides valuable insights into the cellular processes underpinning differences in organ development. Our approach should be applicable to most comparative developmental contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.