Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28202031›Full record

SynthesisImplementation science : IS2017

Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework.

Lisa M Pfadenhauer, Ansgar Gerhardus, Kati Mozygemba, Kristin Bakke Lysdahl, Andrew Booth, Bjørn Hofmann, Philip Wahlster, Stephanie Polus, Jacob Burns, Louise Brereton and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Implementation science : IS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 471 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
471citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

471 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Non-pharmacological interventions targeting mobility among people with advanced cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Characteristics of built food environments associated with alternative protein food choices: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

411 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lisa M PfadenhauerInstitute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. pfadenh@ibe.med.uni-muenchen.de.
Ansgar GerhardusInstitute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Kati MozygembaInstitute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Kristin Bakke LysdahlCentre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Andrew BoothSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Bjørn HofmannCentre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Philip WahlsterInstitute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Stephanie PolusInstitute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jacob BurnsInstitute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Louise BreretonSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Eva RehfuessInstitute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effectiveness of complex interventions, as well as their success in reaching relevant populations, is critically influenced by their implementation in a given context. Current conceptual frameworks often fail to address context and implementation in an integrated way and, where addressed, they tend to focus on organisational context and are mostly concerned with specific health fields. Our objective was to develop a framework to facilitate the structured and comprehensive conceptualisation and assessment of context and implementation of complex interventions.

methodsThe Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework was developed in an iterative manner and underwent extensive application. An initial framework based on a scoping review was tested in rapid assessments, revealing inconsistencies with respect to the underlying concepts. Thus, pragmatic utility concept analysis was undertaken to advance the concepts of context and implementation. Based on these findings, the framework was revised and applied in several systematic reviews, one health technology assessment (HTA) and one applicability assessment of very different complex interventions. Lessons learnt from these applications and from peer review were incorporated, resulting in the CICI framework.

resultsThe CICI framework comprises three dimensions-context, implementation and setting-which interact with one another and with the intervention dimension. Context comprises seven domains (i.e., geographical, epidemiological, socio-cultural, socio-economic, ethical, legal, political); implementation consists of five domains (i.e., implementation theory, process, strategies, agents and outcomes); setting refers to the specific physical location, in which the intervention is put into practise. The intervention and the way it is implemented in a given setting and context can occur on a micro, meso and macro level. Tools to operationalise the framework comprise a checklist, data extraction tools for qualitative and quantitative reviews and a consultation guide for applicability assessments.

conclusionsThe CICI framework addresses and graphically presents context, implementation and setting in an integrated way. It aims at simplifying and structuring complexity in order to advance our understanding of whether and how interventions work. The framework can be applied in systematic reviews and HTA as well as primary research and facilitate communication among teams of researchers and with various stakeholders.

Indexed as

Diffusion of InnovationTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalBioethicsChecklistHealth PolicyLegislation as TopicOrganizational CultureSocioeconomic FactorsApplicabilityComplex interventionConcept analysisContextHealth technology assessmentImplementationPublic healthSystematic reviewTransferability

Identifiers

PMID28202031
PMCPMC5312531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.