Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28201845›Full record

ReviewSeminars in liver disease2017

Regenerative Medicine and the Biliary Tree.

Thiago M De Assuncao, Nidhi Jalan-Sakrikar, Robert C Huebert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in liver disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The utilisation of biliary organoids for biomedical applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Regenerative Medicine of the Bile Duct: Beyond the Myth.International journal of stem cells · 2019
    Review
  14. Cholangiocyte pathobiology.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Peribiliary Glands as the Cellular Origin of Biliary Tract Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thiago M De AssuncaoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota.
Nidhi Jalan-SakrikarDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota.
Robert C HuebertDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota.

Funding

PILOT AND FEASIBILTY PROGRAMP30DK084567 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GREGORY J. GORES · 2009 to 2026
$22.2M
miRNA Regulation of Aquaporin 1 Modulates Vascular Remodelling during CirrhosisK08DK100575 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI HUEBERT, ROBERT CHRISTIAN · 2013 to 2017
$757k
NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK100575NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK084567
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite decades of basic research, biliary diseases remain prevalent, highly morbid, and notoriously difficult to treat. We have, however, dramatically increased our understanding of biliary developmental biology, cholangiocyte pathophysiology, and the endogenous mechanisms of biliary regeneration and repair. All of this complex and rapidly evolving knowledge coincides with an explosion of new technological advances in the area of regenerative medicine. New breakthroughs such as induced pluripotent stem cells and organoid culture are increasingly being applied to the biliary system; it is only a matter of time until new regenerative therapeutics for the cholangiopathies are unveiled. In this review, the authors integrate what is known about biliary development, regeneration, and repair, and link these conceptual advances to the technological breakthroughs that are collectively driving the emergence of a new global field in biliary regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

RegenerationAnimalsBiliary TractBiliary Tract DiseasesHumansLiverRegenerative MedicineStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID28201845
PMCPMC5479436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.