ArticleFEMS microbiology reviews2016
Experimental evolution in biofilm populations.
Article in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterizing nitrogen cycling microorganisms and genes in sediments of the Three Gorges Reservoir.PloS one · 2025Article
- Experimental EvolutionmSystems · 2020Article
- Antimicrobial effects of microwave-induced plasma torch (MiniMIP) treatment on Candida albicans biofilms.Microbial biotechnology · 2019Article
- Nonthermal Plasma Jet Treatment Negatively Affects the Viability and Structure of Candida albicans SC5314 Biofilms.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2018Article
- Expression of fluorescent proteins in Lactobacillus rhamnosus to study host-microbe and microbe-microbe interactions.Microbial biotechnology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.