Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28201715›Full record

ReviewFEMS microbiology reviews2016

Behind the lines-actions of bacterial type III effector proteins in plant cells.

Daniela Büttner

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 137 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
137citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
63.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

137 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 292 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Comparative genomics of 'Microbial genomics · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Immune Responses of Mango Callus Infected byInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Molecular Dialog ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

77 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniela BüttnerGenetics Department, Institute of Biology, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathogenicity of most Gram-negative plant-pathogenic bacteria depends on the type III secretion (T3S) system, which translocates bacterial effector proteins into plant cells. Type III effectors modulate plant cellular pathways to the benefit of the pathogen and promote bacterial multiplication. One major virulence function of type III effectors is the suppression of plant innate immunity, which is triggered upon recognition of pathogen-derived molecular patterns by plant receptor proteins. Type III effectors also interfere with additional plant cellular processes including proteasome-dependent protein degradation, phytohormone signaling, the formation of the cytoskeleton, vesicle transport and gene expression. This review summarizes our current knowledge on the molecular functions of type III effector proteins with known plant target molecules. Furthermore, plant defense strategies for the detection of effector protein activities or effector-triggered alterations in plant targets are discussed.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsPlant CellsPlant ImmunityType III Secretion SystemsDisease ResistanceGram-Negative BacteriaMAP Kinase Signaling SystemBacterial ProteinsType III Secretion SystemscytoskeletonMAPK signalingphytohormonesplant immunityproteasometype III effector

Identifiers

PMID28201715
PMCPMC5091034
OpenAlexW2508804886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.