SynthesisOncotarget2017
Clinicopathologic and prognostic significance of human epidermal growth factor receptor in patients with gastric cancer: An updated meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laryngeal Cancer in the Modern Era: Evolving Trends in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Survival Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Prognostic markers in oesophageal and gastric cancer review. Are they ready for clinical practice?ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Review
- Research progress on exosomal proteins as diagnostic markers of gastric cancer (review article).Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023Review
- Review
- Correlation between the overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor and pathological features of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2021Article
- CD148 Serves as a Prognostic Marker of Gastric Cancer and Hinders Tumor Progression by Dephosphorylating EGFR.Journal of Cancer · 2020Article
- Targeted therapies in metastatic gastric cancer: Current knowledge and future perspectives.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019Review
- Effects of miR‑138‑5p and miR‑204‑5p on the migration and proliferation of gastric cancer cells by targeting EGFR.Oncology reports · 2018Article
- The role of anti-EGFR agents in the first-line treatment of advanced esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this update meta-analysis was to clarify the clinicopathologic and prognostic significance of human epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR) expression in gastric cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL
designSeveral electronic databases were searched from January 1970 to May 2016. The odds ratio (OR) was calculated to assess the association between EGFR expression and pathological parameters. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI were calculated to explore the relationship between EGFR expression and overall survival.
resultsFinally 7229 patients with gastric cancer from 25 eligible studies were included in the present meta analysis. High EGFR expression was found to be significantly related with tumor differentiation (OR=1.96, 95%CI: 1.14-3.34, Z=2.43, P=0.015), lymph node metastasis (OR=2.20, 95% CI: 1.63-2.96, Z=5.17, P=0.001), and tumor stage (OR=2.13, 95% CI: 1.35-3.36, Z=3.25, P=0.001). However, high EGFR expression was not significantly associated with invasion depth (OR=2.09, 95% CI: 0.4-11.05, Z=0.87, P=0.385). The pooled HR suggested that high EGFR expression was significantly correlated with overall survival (HR=1.19, 95% CI 1.04-1.37, Z=2.44, P=0.015).
conclusionsThe present meta-analysis demonstrated that high EGFR expression significantly predicts poor prognosis, suggesting that high EGFR expression may serve as a predictive biomarker for poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.