Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28199851›Full record

ArticleCell reports2017

The Input-Output Relationship of the Cholinergic Basal Forebrain.

Matthew R Gielow, Laszlo Zaborszky

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06294509 (Feasibility and Effects of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Timings in a Sensorimotor Task), which is not on this map. Cited by 159 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
159citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06294509 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility and Effects of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Timings in a Sensorimotor Task

TypeinterventionalSponsorOlivier LambercyRan2024 to 2025Enrolled75ConditionsHealthyArmsin-house developed transcutaneous auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

159 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Activity-Dependent Regulation of Basal Forebrain Cholinergic Neurons by Striatal Spiny Projection Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  8. Chronic Pain and Cognitive Dysfunction: Clinical Implement, Mechanism, and Therapeutic Strategy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Social Reward Learning Deficits and Concordant Brain Alterations in Rats Overexpressing Disrupted-in-Schizophrenia 1 (DISC1).The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Infralimbic Projections to the Substantia Innominata-Ventral Pallidum Constrain Defensive Behavior during Extinction Learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article

99 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthew R GielowCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.
Laszlo ZaborszkyCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ 07102, USA. Electronic address: zaborszky@axon.rutgers.edu.

Funding

AFFERENT REGULATION OF CHOLINERGIC FOREBRAIN NEURONSR01NS023945 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI ZABORSZKY, LASZLO · 1986 to 2019
$6.5M
AFFERENT REGULATION OF CHOLINERGIC FOREBRAIN NEURONSRF1NS023945 · NINDS · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI ZABORSZKY, LASZLO · 2020 to 2020
$2.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS023945NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS023945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Basal forebrain cholinergic neurons influence cortical state, plasticity, learning, and attention. They collectively innervate the entire cerebral cortex, differentially controlling acetylcholine efflux across different cortical areas and timescales. Such control might be achieved by differential inputs driving separable cholinergic outputs, although no input-output relationship on a brain-wide level has ever been demonstrated. Here, we identify input neurons to cholinergic cells projecting to specific cortical regions by infecting cholinergic axon terminals with a monosynaptically restricted viral tracer. This approach revealed several circuit motifs, such as central amygdala neurons synapsing onto basolateral amygdala-projecting cholinergic neurons or strong somatosensory cortical input to motor cortex-projecting cholinergic neurons. The presence of input cells in the parasympathetic midbrain nuclei contacting frontally projecting cholinergic neurons suggest that the network regulating the inner eye muscles are additionally regulating cortical state via acetylcholine efflux. This dataset enables future circuit-level experiments to identify drivers of known cortical cholinergic functions.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineAnimalsAxonsBasal ForebrainCholinergic AgentsCholinergic NeuronsFemaleMaleNeuronsParasympathetic Nervous SystemRatsAcetylcholineCholinergic Agentsacetylcholinebasal forebrainbasalocorticalChAT-crecholinergicconnectomemonosynapticrabiesrattransgenic

Identifiers

PMID28199851
PMCPMC5725195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.