Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28199773›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2017

The Road to HLA Antibody Evaluation: Do Not Rely on MFI.

H C Sullivan, R S Liwski, R A Bray, H M Gebel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Scientific Statement on pulmonary antibody-mediated rejection and proposed graft, antibody, and pathology (GAP) definition.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Anti-HLA antibodies in lung transplantation: diagnostic pitfalls and future directions.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Impact of allele-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen class I antibodies on organ allocation.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Outstanding questions in transplantation: B cells, alloantibodies, and humoral rejection.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

H C SullivanDepartment of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA.
R S LiwskiDepartment of Pathology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
R A BrayDepartment of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA.
H M GebelDepartment of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA.

Funding

Training Grant in Transfusion Medicine (T32)T32HL069769 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Una T O'Doherty, John D Roback · 2004 to 2026
$2.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL069769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technological advances in HLA laboratory testing undoubtedly improved the sensitivity and specificity of HLA antibody assessment but not without introducing a set of challenges regarding data interpretation. In particular, the introduction of solid-phase single-antigen bead (SAB) antibody assessment brought the belief that mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was a quantifiable value. As such, MFI levels heavily influenced HLA antibody reporting, monitoring, and clinical practice. However, given that SAB testing was neither intended for nor approved to be quantifiable, is the use of MFI in current clinical and laboratory practice valid? What, if anything, does this numerical value actually reveal about the pathogenic potential of the antibody? What are the pitfalls and caveats associated with reporting MFI? Herein, we travel the road to HLA antibody assessment and explore the reliability of MFI values to make clinical decisions.

Indexed as

FluorescenceGraft RejectionHistocompatibility TestingHLA AntigensHumansIsoantibodiesKidney TransplantationHLA AntigensIsoantibodiesalloantibodyalloantigenclinical research/practicehistocompatibility

Identifiers

PMID28199773
PMCPMC8663029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.