Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28199524›Full record

SynthesisClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2017

Impact of Outpatient Neuraminidase Inhibitor Treatment in Patients Infected With Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 at High Risk of Hospitalization: An Individual Participant Data Metaanalysis.

Sudhir Venkatesan, Puja R Myles, Jo Leonardi-Bee, Stella G Muthuri, Malak Al Masri, Nick Andrews, Carlos Bantar, Gal Dubnov-Raz, Patrick Gérardin, Evelyn S C Koay and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Development of Antiviral Drugs for Influenza.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Influenza.Lancet (London, England) · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Influenza Therapeutics in Clinical Practice-Challenges and Recent Advances.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 14 institutions in 10 countries.

Sudhir VenkatesanDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, and.
Puja R MylesDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, and.
Jo Leonardi-BeeDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, and.
Stella G MuthuriMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, University College London, United Kingdom.
Malak Al MasriMinistry of Health, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Nick AndrewsPublic Health England, United Kingdom.
Carlos BantarDepartment of Infection Control, Hospital San Martín de Paraná, Entre Ríos, Argentina.
Gal Dubnov-RazEdmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Sheba Medical Center, Israel.
Patrick GérardinPôle Femme Mère Enfant, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion.
Evelyn S C KoayMolecular Diagnostic Centre, Department of Laboratory Medicine National University Hospital, and.
Tze Ping LohMolecular Diagnostic Centre, Department of Laboratory Medicine National University Hospital, and.
Ziad MemishMinistry of Health, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Elizabeth MillerPublic Health England, United Kingdom.
Maria E OlivaDepartment of Infection Control, Hospital San Martín de Paraná, Entre Ríos, Argentina.
Barbara A RathDepartment of Pediatrics, Charité University Medical Center, and.
Brunhilde SchweigerNational Reference Centre Influenza at Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Julian W TangMolecular Diagnostic Centre, Department of Laboratory Medicine National University Hospital, and.
Dat TranDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Canada.
Tjasa VidmarGeneral Hospital Slovenj Gradec, Slovenia.
Pauline A WaightPublic Health England, United Kingdom.
Jonathan S Nguyen-Van-TamDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, and.
University of Nottingham · GBPublic Health England · GBAlfaisal University · SACharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEEdmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital · ILMinistry of Health · SANational University Hospital · SGNational University of Singapore · SGPeuplements végétaux et bioagresseurs en milieu tropical · RERobert Koch Institute · DESickKids Foundation · CAŠolski center Slovenj Gradec · SIUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12019/4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile evidence exists to support the effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) in reducing mortality when given to hospitalized patients with A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infection, the impact of outpatient treatment on hospitalization has not been clearly established. We investigated the impact of outpatient NAI treatment on subsequent hospitalization in patients with A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infection.

methodsWe assembled general community and outpatient data from 9 clinical centers in different countries collected between January 2009 and December 2010. We standardized data from each study center to create a pooled dataset and then used mixed-effects logistic regression modeling to determine the effect of NAI treatment on hospitalization. We adjusted for NAI treatment propensity and preadmission antibiotic use, including "study center" as a random intercept to account for differences in baseline hospitalization rate between centers.

resultsWe included 3376 patients with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, of whom 3085 (91.4%) had laboratory-confirmed infection. Eight hundred seventy-three patients (25.8%) received outpatient or community-based NAI treatment, 928 of 2395 (38.8%) with available data had dyspnea or respiratory distress, and hospitalizations occurred in 1705 (50.5%). After adjustment for preadmission antibiotics and NAI treatment propensity, preadmission NAI treatment was associated with decreased odds of hospital admission compared to no NAI treatment (adjusted odds ratio, 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.30).

conclusionsIn a population with confirmed or suspected A(H1N1)pdm09 and at high risk of hospitalization, outpatient or community-based NAI treatment significantly reduced the likelihood of requiring hospital admission. These data suggest that community patients with severe influenza should receive NAI treatment.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAmbulatory CareAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntiviral AgentsEnzyme InhibitorsFemaleHospitalizationHumansInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanMaleMiddle AgedNeuraminidaseOdds RatioAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntiviral AgentsEnzyme InhibitorsNeuraminidasehospitalizationindividual participant data metaanalysesinfluenzaneuraminidase inhibitorspandemic.

Identifiers

PMID28199524
PMCPMC5411393
OpenAlexW2588819132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.