Trial reportJAMA cardiology2017
Identification of Patients With Stable Chest Pain Deriving Minimal Value From Noninvasive Testing: The PROMISE Minimal-Risk Tool, A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01174550 (PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain - The PROMISE Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain - The PROMISE Trial
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Economic Outcomes With Precision Diagnostic Testing Versus Usual Testing in Stable Chest Pain: Results From the PRECISE Randomized Trial.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2025Trial
- Quality of Life Outcomes With a Risk-Based Precision Testing Strategy Versus Usual Testing in Stable Patients With Suspected Coronary Disease: Results From the PRECISE Randomized Trial.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2025Trial
- Stress Testing Versus CT Angiography in Patients With Diabetes and Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2019Trial
- Diagnostic and prognostic benefits of computed tomography coronary angiography using the 2016 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance within a randomised trial.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2018Trial
- Identification of patients with stable chest pain deriving minimal value from coronary computed tomography angiography: An external validation of the PROMISE minimal-risk tool.International journal of cardiology · 2018Trial
- Coronary Plaque Vulnerability and Pericoronary Adipose Tissue Inflammation: Emerging Insights from Advanced CT Imaging.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Retrospective analysis of the performance of the PROMISE minimal risk tool for patients presenting with recent onset stable chest pain.Open heart · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a deep-learning algorithm for rule-in and rule-out coronary artery disease based on electrocardiogram without evidence of myocardial ischemia.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Preoperative Diagnostic Assessment of Patients with Cardiovascular Risk Factors Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery: A 2025 Update.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2025Review
- Prediction of coronary artery disease based on facial temperature information captured by non-contact infrared thermography.BMJ health & care informatics · 2024Article
- The ABCs of the 2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline for the management of patients with chronic coronary disease.Clinical cardiology · 2024Review
- Safe Deferral of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for Patients With a Low Pretest Probability of Coronary Artery Disease in 2019 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Comparison of two diagnostic strategies for patients with stable chest pain suggestive of chronic coronary syndrome: rationale and design of the double-blind, pragmatic, randomized and controlled OPERATE Trial.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- Reframing the Paradigm for Assessing Optimal Test Selection When Suspecting Chronic Coronary Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Machine learning approaches that use clinical, laboratory, and electrocardiogram data enhance the prediction of obstructive coronary artery disease.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Clinical and cost implications of deferred testing in low-risk patients with stable chest pain: a simulation using the PROMISE trial.American heart journal · 2023Article
- Clinical Application of Myocardial Perfusion SPECT in Patients with Suspected or Known Coronary Artery Disease. What Role in the Multimodality Imaging Era?Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Guidelines recommend noninvasive testing for patients with stable chest pain, although many subsequently have normal test results and no adverse clinical events. Objective: To describe a risk tool developed to use only pretest clinical data to identify patients with chest pain with normal coronary arteries and no clinical events during follow-up (minimal-risk cohort). Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of a randomized, pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain [PROMISE]) includes stable, symptomatic outpatients without known coronary artery disease referred for noninvasive testing at 193 sites in North America. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) vs functional testing. Main Outcomes and Measures: A low-risk tool was developed and internally validated from July 27, 2010, to September 19, 2013, in 4631 patients receiving CCTA as their initial test, with a median follow-up of 25 months. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate pretest variables to determine factors associated with minimal risk using a two-thirds random sample for model derivation (n = 3087) and a one-third sample for testing and validation (n = 1544). The model was then applied to the CCTA and functional testing arms, and test results and event rates were ascertained. Results: A total of 1243 of 4631 patients (26.8%) were in the minimal-risk cohort. The final minimal-risk model included 10 clinical variables that together were correlated with normal CCTA results and no clinical events (C statistic = 0.725 for the derivation and validation subsets; 95% CI, 0.705-0.746): younger age; female sex; racial or ethnic minority; no history of hypertension, diabetes, or dyslipidemia; family history of premature coronary artery disease; never smoking; symptoms unrelated to physical or mental stress; and higher high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level. Across the entire PROMISE cohort, this model was associated with the lowest rates of severely abnormal test results (1.3% for CCTA; 5.6% for functional) and cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction (0.5% for a median of 25 months) among patients at the highest probability (10th decile) of minimal risk. Conclusions and Relevance: In contemporary practice, more than 25% of patients with stable chest pain referred for noninvasive testing will have normal coronary arteries and no long-term clinical events. A clinical tool using readily available pretest variables discriminates such minimal-risk patients, for whom deferred testing may be considered. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01174550.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.