Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28199464›Full record

Trial reportJAMA cardiology2017

Identification of Patients With Stable Chest Pain Deriving Minimal Value From Noninvasive Testing: The PROMISE Minimal-Risk Tool, A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Christopher B Fordyce, Pamela S Douglas, Rhonda S Roberts, Udo Hoffmann, Hussein R Al-Khalidi, Manesh R Patel, Christopher B Granger, John Kostis, Daniel B Mark, Kerry L Lee and 2 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01174550 (PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain - The PROMISE Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01174550 nacompletednot on this map

PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain - The PROMISE Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke UniversityRan2010 to 2014Enrolled10,003ConditionsChest PainArmsCoronary Angiography, Stress Echocardiogram, Nuclear Stress Test, Exercise Electrocardiogram
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christopher B FordyceDivision of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Pamela S DouglasDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Rhonda S RobertsDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Udo HoffmannDepartment of Radiology, Division of Cardiovascular Imaging and Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Hussein R Al-KhalidiDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Manesh R PatelDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Christopher B GrangerDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
John KostisDivision of Cardiology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Daniel B MarkDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Kerry L LeeDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
James E UdelsonThe CardioVascular Center, Division of Cardiology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) Investigators

Funding

PROMISE Trial: Clinical Coordinating CenterR01HL098237 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DOUGLAS, PAMELA SUSAN · 2009 to 2014
$27.3M
PROMISE Trial: SDCCR01HL098236 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, KERRY L · 2009 to 2014
$5.0M
PROMISE Trial: Dx CoreR01HL098305 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HOFFMANN, UDO · 2009 to 2014
$3.5M
PROMISE Trial: EQOL Coordinating CenterR01HL098235 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK, DANIEL B · 2009 to 2014
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098235NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098236NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098237NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Guidelines recommend noninvasive testing for patients with stable chest pain, although many subsequently have normal test results and no adverse clinical events. Objective: To describe a risk tool developed to use only pretest clinical data to identify patients with chest pain with normal coronary arteries and no clinical events during follow-up (minimal-risk cohort). Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of a randomized, pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain [PROMISE]) includes stable, symptomatic outpatients without known coronary artery disease referred for noninvasive testing at 193 sites in North America. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) vs functional testing. Main Outcomes and Measures: A low-risk tool was developed and internally validated from July 27, 2010, to September 19, 2013, in 4631 patients receiving CCTA as their initial test, with a median follow-up of 25 months. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate pretest variables to determine factors associated with minimal risk using a two-thirds random sample for model derivation (n = 3087) and a one-third sample for testing and validation (n = 1544). The model was then applied to the CCTA and functional testing arms, and test results and event rates were ascertained. Results: A total of 1243 of 4631 patients (26.8%) were in the minimal-risk cohort. The final minimal-risk model included 10 clinical variables that together were correlated with normal CCTA results and no clinical events (C statistic = 0.725 for the derivation and validation subsets; 95% CI, 0.705-0.746): younger age; female sex; racial or ethnic minority; no history of hypertension, diabetes, or dyslipidemia; family history of premature coronary artery disease; never smoking; symptoms unrelated to physical or mental stress; and higher high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level. Across the entire PROMISE cohort, this model was associated with the lowest rates of severely abnormal test results (1.3% for CCTA; 5.6% for functional) and cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction (0.5% for a median of 25 months) among patients at the highest probability (10th decile) of minimal risk. Conclusions and Relevance: In contemporary practice, more than 25% of patients with stable chest pain referred for noninvasive testing will have normal coronary arteries and no long-term clinical events. A clinical tool using readily available pretest variables discriminates such minimal-risk patients, for whom deferred testing may be considered. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01174550.

Indexed as

Chest PainComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseExercise TestFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSurvival RateTime FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28199464
PMCPMC5470411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.