Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28199364›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2017

Coagulation profile in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: A randomized, controlled trial.

Thomas Decker Christensen, Henrik Vad, Søren Pedersen, Kåre Hornbech, Nora Elisabeth Zois, Peter B Licht, Mads Nybo, Anne-Mette Hvas

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Increased In Vivo Thrombin Generation in Patients with Localized Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Unfit for Surgery.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thomas Decker ChristensenDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery & Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6509-8510
Henrik VadDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery & Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Søren PedersenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care & Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kåre HornbechDepartment of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nora Elisabeth ZoisDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peter B LichtDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Mads NyboDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Anne-Mette HvasDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry & Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnowledge about the impact of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin (LMWH) on the coagulation system in patients undergoing minimal invasive lung cancer surgery is sparse. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of LMWH on the coagulation system in patients undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) lobectomy for primary lung cancer.

methodsSixty-three patients diagnosed with primary lung cancer undergoing VATS lobectomy were randomized to either subcutaneous injection with dalteparin (Fragmin®) 5000 IE once daily or no intervention. Coagulation was assessed pre-, peri-, and the first two days postoperatively by standard coagulation blood test, thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) and thrombin generation.

resultsPatients undergoing potential curative surgery for lung cancer were not hypercoagulable preoperatively. There was no statistically significant difference in the majority of the assessed coagulation parameters after LMWH, except that the no intervention group had a higher peak thrombin and a shorter INTEM clotting time on the first postoperative day and a lower fibrinogen level on the second postoperative day. A lower level of fibrin d-dimer in the LMWH group was found on the 1. and 2.postoperative day, although not statistical significant. No differences were found between the two groups in the amount of bleeding or number of thromboembolic events.

conclusionsUse of LMWH administered once daily as thromboprophylaxis did not alter the coagulation profile per se. As the present study primarily evaluated biochemical endpoints, further studies using clinical endpoints are needed in regards of an optimized thromboprophylaxis approach.

Indexed as

Thoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedAgedAnticoagulantsBlood CoagulationFemaleFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsFibrinogenHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPartial Thromboplastin TimePostoperative PeriodThrombinThromboembolismAnticoagulantsFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment DFibrinogenHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightThrombin

Identifiers

PMID28199364
PMCPMC5310875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.