Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28199317›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Colorimetric tests for diagnosis of filarial infection and vector surveillance using non-instrumented nucleic acid loop-mediated isothermal amplification (NINA-LAMP).

Catherine B Poole, Zhiru Li, Andy Alhassan, Dylan Guelig, Steven Diesburg, Nathan A Tanner, Yinhua Zhang, Thomas C Evans, Paul LaBarre, Samuel Wanji and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Current Status of the Diagnosis ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Molecular surveillance detects high prevalence of the neglected parasitemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine B PooleNew England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA United States of America.
Zhiru LiNew England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA United States of America.
Andy AlhassanNew England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA United States of America.
Dylan GueligPATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Steven DiesburgPATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Nathan A TannerNew England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA United States of America.
Yinhua ZhangNew England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA United States of America.
Thomas C EvansNew England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA United States of America.
Paul LaBarrePATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Samuel WanjiResearch Foundation in Tropical Diseases and Environment, Buea, Cameroon.
Robert A BurtonPATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Clotilde K S CarlowNew England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA United States of America.
New England Biolabs (United States) · USProgram for Appropriate Technology in Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate detection of filarial parasites in humans is essential for the implementation and evaluation of mass drug administration programs to control onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis. Determining the infection levels in vector populations is also important for assessing transmission, deciding when drug treatments may be terminated and for monitoring recrudescence. Immunological methods to detect infection in humans are available, however, cross-reactivity issues have been reported. Nucleic acid-based molecular assays offer high levels of specificity and sensitivity, and can be used to detect infection in both humans and vectors. In this study we developed loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) tests to detect three different filarial DNAs in human and insect samples using pH sensitive dyes for enhanced visual detection of amplification. Furthermore, reactions were performed in a portable, non-instrumented nucleic acid amplification (NINA) device that provides a stable heat source for LAMP. The efficacy of several strand displacing DNA polymerases were evaluated in combination with neutral red or phenol red dyes. Colorimetric NINA-LAMP assays targeting Brugia Hha I repeat, Onchocerca volvulus GST1a and Wuchereria bancrofti LDR each exhibit species-specificity and are also highly sensitive, detecting DNA equivalent to 1/10-1/5000th of one microfilaria. Reaction times varied depending on whether a single copy gene (70 minutes, O. volvulus) or repetitive DNA (40 min, B. malayi and W. bancrofti) was employed as a biomarker. The NINA heater can be used to detect multiple infections simultaneously. The accuracy, simplicity and versatility of the technology suggests that colorimetric NINA-LAMP assays are ideally suited for monitoring the success of filariasis control programs.

Indexed as

Elephantiasis, FilarialOnchocerciasisAedesAnimalsColorimetryDNA, HelminthHumansNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesOnchocerca volvulusSimuliidaeWuchereria bancroftiDNA, Helminth

Identifiers

PMID28199317
PMCPMC5310896
OpenAlexW2588014273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.