Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28199022›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2017

Recent advances in exploring the neural underpinnings of auditory scene perception.

Joel S Snyder, Mounya Elhilali

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Why are listeners hindered by talker variability?Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024
    Review
  5. The hearing hippocampus.Progress in neurobiology · 2022
    Review
  6. Cortical Processing of Binaural Cues as Shown by EEG Responses to Random-Chord Stereograms.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A Crucial Test of the Population Separation Model of Auditory Stream Segregation in Macaque Primary Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joel S SnyderDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Mounya ElhilaliDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

Smart stethoscope for monitoring and diagnosis of lung diseasesR01HL133043 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ELHILALI, MOUNYA · 2016 to 2019
$2.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL133043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of auditory scene analysis have traditionally relied on paradigms using artificial sounds-and conventional behavioral techniques-to elucidate how we perceptually segregate auditory objects or streams from each other. In the past few decades, however, there has been growing interest in uncovering the neural underpinnings of auditory segregation using human and animal neuroscience techniques, as well as computational modeling. This largely reflects the growth in the fields of cognitive neuroscience and computational neuroscience and has led to new theories of how the auditory system segregates sounds in complex arrays. The current review focuses on neural and computational studies of auditory scene perception published in the last few years. Following the progress that has been made in these studies, we describe (1) theoretical advances in our understanding of the most well-studied aspects of auditory scene perception, namely segregation of sequential patterns of sounds and concurrently presented sounds; (2) the diversification of topics and paradigms that have been investigated; and (3) how new neuroscience techniques (including invasive neurophysiology in awake humans, genotyping, and brain stimulation) have been used in this field.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAttentionAuditory CortexAuditory PathwaysAuditory PerceptionBrain MappingCognitive NeuroscienceComputational BiologyGenotypeHumansSoundauditory scene analysisauditory stream segregationchange deafnessconcurrent sound segregationinformational masking

Identifiers

PMID28199022
PMCPMC5446279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.