Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28198972›Full record

Trial reportJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB

Postoperative pain intensity after using different instrumentation techniques: a randomized clinical study.

Ersan Çiçek, Mustafa Murat Koçak, Sibel Koçak, Baran Can Sağlam, Sevinç Aktemur Türker

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04510571 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of Postoperative Pain and Instrumentation Time After Root Canal Treatment With Rotary and Reciprocal File Systems in Children - A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorEge UniversityRan2020 to 2020Enrolled50ConditionsPostoperative PainArmsEvaluating Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Treatment with Protaper Next, Evaluating Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Treatment with Reciproc Blue Files
NCT07571837 narecruitingnot on this map

Modulation of Periapical Inflammation Following Nano-Calcium Hydroxide and Nano-Chitosan Intracanal Medications in Endodontic Retreatment Cases: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAl-Azhar UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled63ConditionsPost-operative Pain, Periapical InflammationArmsNanochitosan paste, Nano-calcium hydroxide paste, Calcium hydroxide paste
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Brazilian dental journal
    Trial
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ersan ÇiçekBülent Ecevit University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Mustafa Murat KoçakBülent Ecevit University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Sibel KoçakBülent Ecevit University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Baran Can SağlamBülent Ecevit University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Sevinç Aktemur TürkerBülent Ecevit University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Bülent Ecevit University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this clinical study was to evaluate the influence of the instrumentation techniques on the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain in single-visit root canal treatment. MATERIAL AND

methodsNinety patients with single root/canal and non-vital pulps were included. The patients were assigned into 3 groups according to root canal instrumentation technique used; modified step-back, reciprocal, and rotational techniques. Root canal treatment was carried out in a single visit and the severity of postoperative pain was assessed via 4-point pain intensity scale. All the participants were called through the phone at 12, 24 and 48 h to obtain the pain scores. Data were analyzed through the Kruskal-Wallis test.

resultsThere was significant difference between all groups (p<0.05). The modified step-back technique produced postoperative pain significantly lower than the rotational (p=0.018) and reciprocal (p=0.020) techniques. No difference was found between the reciprocal and rotational techniques (p=0.868). Postoperative pain in the first 12 h period (p=0.763) and in the 24 h period (p=0.147) was not significantly different between the groups. However, the difference in the 48 h period was statistically different between the groups (p=0.040).

conclusionAll instrumentation techniques caused postoperative pain. The modified step-back technique produced less pain compared to the rotational and reciprocal techniques.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDental InstrumentsEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPostoperative PainRoot Canal TherapySeverity of Illness IndexStatistics, NonparametricTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28198972
PMCPMC5289396
OpenAlexW2597830700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.