Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28198668›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

Comparative analysis of Corynebacterium glutamicum genomes: a new perspective for the industrial production of amino acids.

Junjie Yang, Sheng Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Glucosylation of Isoeugenol and Monoterpenes inMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of l-arginine (produced byEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Transcriptional Regulation of the Creatine Utilization Genes ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Metabolic engineering ofSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Glutamatergic Signaling Along The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Junjie YangKey Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 300 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Sheng YangKey Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 300 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China. syang@sibs.ac.cn.
Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences · CNThe Synergetic Innovation Center for Advanced Materials · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCorynebacterium glutamicum is a non-pathogenic bacterium widely used in industrial amino acid production and metabolic engineering research. Although the genome sequences of some C. glutamicum strains are available, comprehensive comparative genome analyses of these species have not been done. Six wild type C. glutamicum strains were sequenced using next-generation sequencing technology in our study. Together with 20 previously reported strains, we present a comprehensive comparative analysis of C. glutamicum genomes.

resultsBy average nucleotide identity (ANI) analysis, we show that 10 strains, which were previously classified either in the genus Brevibacterium, or as some other species within the genus Corynebacterium, should be reclassified as members of the species C. glutamicum. C. glutamicum has an open pan-genome with 2359 core genes. An additional NAD

conclusionsThis is the first comprehensive comparative analysis of C. glutamicum genomes at the pan-genomic level. Whole genome comparison provides definitive evidence for classifying the members of this species. Identifying an aditional gdh gene in some C. glutamicum strains may accelerate further research on glutamate synthesis. Our proposed pipeline can provide a clear perspective, including the presumed ancestor, the strain breeding trajectory, and the genomic variations necessary to increase amino acid production in C. glutamicum.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialGenomicsAllelesAmino AcidsCorynebacterium glutamicumHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMultilocus Sequence TypingPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAmino AcidsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SComparative genomicsCorynebacterium glutamicumPan-genomeProduction of amino acids

Identifiers

PMID28198668
PMCPMC5310272
OpenAlexW2579922223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.